Garry's ModFPS onRyzen 7 7800X3D&RTX PRO 6000

Garry's Mod

A Source engine sandbox where performance depends entirely on the mods and contraptions you spawn. RAM errors are common on systems with only 4GB.

Garry's Mod - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low596 FPS
medium550 FPS
high500 FPS
ultra450 FPS
1440P
low512 FPS
medium507 FPS
high492 FPS
ultra450 FPS
4K
low374 FPS
medium347 FPS
high342 FPS
ultra290 FPS

Performance Report

Garry's Mod

RTX PRO 6000 + Ryzen 7 7800X3D
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 450 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 450 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 290 FPS.

Official Requirements

The RTX PRO 6000 is 1195% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 750) for Garry's Mod. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 160% above the recommended CPU (Core i5).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The RTX PRO 6000 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, 4k (high/ultra), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 4k (low/medium).

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

RTX PRO 6000:$8565(updated 2/10/2026)
Official Launch Price: $8565
Ryzen 7 7800X3D:$384(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $449

Combo price: $8949. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 450 FPS, equivalent to 0.05 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.067 fps/$0.061 fps/$0.056 fps/$0.050 fps/$
1440p0.057 fps/$0.057 fps/$0.055 fps/$0.050 fps/$
4k0.042 fps/$0.039 fps/$0.038 fps/$0.032 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Ryzen 7 7800X3D|RTX PRO 6000

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p medium, the RTX PRO 6000 sets the ceiling at about 439 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has headroom up to 564 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 22% (FPS gap: 125 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 10/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 2/12.

Verdict

GPU Limits CPU

Your RTX PRO 6000 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D frame-generation potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 19%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 22%
HighGPU Limits CPU 17%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 19%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowGPU Limits CPU 13%
MediumGPU Limits CPU 17%
HighGPU Limits CPU 18%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 18%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighGPU Limits CPU 7%
UltraGPU Limits CPU 7%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Ryzen 7 7800X3D and RTX PRO 6000

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU0% - 0%
GPU12% - 32%
<>
Medium
CPU0% - 0%
GPU12% - 32%
<>
High
CPU0% - 0%
GPU12% - 32%
<>
Ultra
CPU0% - 0%
GPU12% - 31%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU7% - 15%
<>
GPU5% - 17%
<>
Medium
CPU7% - 15%
<>
GPU5% - 17%
<>
High
CPU7% - 15%
<>
GPU5% - 17%
<>
Ultra
CPU5% - 15%
<>
GPU5% - 16%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU7% - 15%
<>
GPU5% - 17%
<>
Medium
CPU7% - 15%
<>
GPU5% - 17%
<>
High
CPU7% - 15%
<>
GPU5% - 17%
<>
Ultra
CPU5% - 15%
<>
GPU5% - 16%
<>

Performance Summary

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D + RTX PRO 6000 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 0% and 15% and GPU utilization between 5% and 32%. Ryzen 7 7800X3D keeps significant headroom across presets, while RTX PRO 6000 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 22% at 1080p to 11% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 0% to 11%.

Load Interpretation

Neither component is close to saturation: CPU tops out at 15% and GPU at 32%. This pattern suggests possible engine-side limits, an FPS cap, or workload constraints unrelated to raw hardware throughput. It also shows why low utilization does not automatically mean there is no FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 0% and GPU 22%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 11% and GPU 11%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 11% and GPU 11%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 0% (0-0%) and GPU 22% (12-32%), which keeps RTX PRO 6000 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 7 7800X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and RTX PRO 6000 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Garry's Mod Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Ryzen 7 7800X3D
cpu icon
34,293
Your Score
MinimumPentium 4
RecommendedCore i5
GPU - RTX PRO 6000
gpu icon
42,899
Your Score
MinimumGeForce 6 series
RecommendedGeForce GTX 750

Your CPU is 160% above and your GPU is 1195% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.

CPU

+160%vsrecommended

GPU

+1195%vsrecommended

CPU

+1043%vsminimum

GPU

+12900%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce 6 series
Processor: Pentium 4
Memory: 4 GB
Disk Space: 5 GB
System: Windows 7
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 750
Processor: Core i5
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 20 GB
System: Windows 10

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and RTX PRO 6000 run Garry's Mod well?

Yes, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the RTX PRO 6000 can run Garry's Mod smoothly up to 4k achieving around 290 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 1195% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 160% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Garry's Mod?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $8949 ($384 CPU (Rank #212 Value) + $8565 GPU (Rank #91 Value)). Your RTX PRO 6000 provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end card with a significantly better value rating.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Garry's Mod performance?

Your RTX PRO 6000 is already a top-tier graphics card. While it's technically the limiting factor here (which means you are fully utilizing your GPU's visual horsepower exactly as intended), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Garry's Mod performance right now. GPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Garry's Mod?

Garry's Mod does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Garry's Mod?

Garry's Mod requires at minimum a Pentium 4 (CPU) and GeForce 6 series (GPU) with 4 GB RAM and 5 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5 and GeForce GTX 750 with 8 GB RAM. Your Ryzen 7 7800X3D and RTX PRO 6000 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Garry's Mod FPS estimates for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and RTX PRO 6000?

These Garry's Mod FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.