Hearts of Iron IV
Known to slow down in the late game due to the exponential number of unit calculations. Single-core CPU speed is the most important factor for performance.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 105 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 101 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 98 FPS.
The Radeon Pro W6900X is 343% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 570) for Hearts of Iron IV. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is 1470% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-750).
The Radeon Pro W6900X sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D still has additional frame-generation headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $5465.38. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 105 FPS, equivalent to 0.02 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.029 fps/$ | 0.023 fps/$ | 0.021 fps/$ | 0.019 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.027 fps/$ | 0.022 fps/$ | 0.021 fps/$ | 0.018 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.025 fps/$ | 0.021 fps/$ | 0.020 fps/$ | 0.018 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
This chart answers a simple question: which upgrade is more likely to increase FPS first? In this case, the answer is clearly the GPU.
The largest gap appears at 1080p Medium, where the Radeon Pro W6900X reaches about 98 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D still has headroom up to roughly 122 FPS.
That means the Radeon Pro W6900X is hitting its performance ceiling first, leaving a 20% gap versus the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's available headroom in the most unbalanced scenario. Across all tested settings, this pairing is GPU-limited in 12 out of 12 cases, with 0 CPU-limited and 0 balanced results.
Overall, this is a clearly GPU-bound combination in this game.
The Radeon Pro W6900X is consistently the limiting part in this game, so upgrading the GPU is more likely to deliver a larger FPS gain than upgrading the CPU.
This chart shows which upgrade is more likely to unlock more FPS in each tested setting. The lower line represents the part that reaches its limit first. When the CPU and GPU lines stay close together, the system is more balanced. When the gap widens, one component is more clearly holding the other back. Hover any setting to inspect it.
The lower line is the current limiter. The closer the two lines are, the more balanced the CPU and GPU are for this game.
Each line represents an estimated FPS ceiling for one component, rather than live usage alone.
To estimate the CPU ceiling, we pair the Ryzen 7 9800X3D with GeForce RTX 5090, our current GPU anchor. To estimate the GPU ceiling, we pair the Radeon Pro W6900X with Ryzen 9 9950X3D, our current CPU anchor.
The lower line indicates the current limiter, since that component reaches its FPS ceiling first. In most scenarios, that is also the part most likely to deliver the bigger performance uplift if upgraded first.
The percentage shown represents the gap between the two ceilings. In practical terms, it shows how much of the stronger component's potential is left unused because the weaker one becomes the bottleneck first.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 1470% above and your GPU is 343% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+1470%vsrecommended
+343%vsrecommended
+1015%vsminimum
+454%vsminimum
Yes, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D paired with the Radeon Pro W6900X can run Hearts of Iron IV smoothly up to 4k achieving around 98 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 343% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 1470% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $5,465.38 ($465.38 CPU + $5,000 GPU). Your Radeon Pro W6900X is currently the main performance bottleneck and its market value ($5,000) is actually higher than newer, faster alternatives. Trading it or upgrading could yield immediate profit and performance gains. For example, upgrading to the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell for around $2,399 (Rank #299 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance while costing less than your current GPU.
For Hearts of Iron IV, upgrading the GPU would usually give you the most noticeable improvement. In the Performance Limiter Analysis, the Radeon Pro W6900X is the side that most often caps the frame rate, while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D still has additional headroom in the tested presets. The main bottleneck appears on the GPU side. The largest gap shows up at 1080p Medium, where the GPU reaches about 98 FPS while the CPU still has headroom up to roughly 122 FPS. Across all tested settings, the distribution is 12/12 GPU-limited, 0/12 CPU-limited, and 0/12 balanced.
Hearts of Iron IV does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Hearts of Iron IV requires at minimum a Core 2 Quad Q9400 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 470 (GPU) with 4 GB RAM and 2 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-750 and GeForce GTX 570 with 4 GB RAM. Your Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Radeon Pro W6900X both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Hearts of Iron IV FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
