Euro Truck Simulator 2
The lighting engine has been updated over the years. It scales well, but running at 'Ultra' settings with high scaling can challenge even modern GPUs.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 143 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 124 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 83 FPS.
The Titan X Pascal is 17% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1660) for Euro Truck Simulator 2. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is 126% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-9600).
At lower resolutions (1080p low), the Ryzen 7 9800X3D sets the FPS ceiling. As graphical load increases at (1440p (medium/high/ultra), all 4k settings), the Titan X Pascal becomes the FPS-limiting side. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p (medium/high/ultra), 1440p low.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $665.38. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 143 FPS, equivalent to 0.21 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.295 fps/$ | 0.268 fps/$ | 0.236 fps/$ | 0.215 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.268 fps/$ | 0.236 fps/$ | 0.200 fps/$ | 0.186 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.173 fps/$ | 0.158 fps/$ | 0.140 fps/$ | 0.125 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
This chart answers a simple question: which upgrade is more likely to increase FPS first? In this case, the answer is more often the GPU.
The largest gap appears at 4K Ultra, where the Titan X Pascal reaches about 118 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D still has headroom up to roughly 150 FPS.
That means the Titan X Pascal is hitting its performance ceiling first, leaving a 21% gap versus the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's available headroom in the most unbalanced scenario. Across all tested settings, this pairing is GPU-limited in 7 out of 12 cases, with 1 CPU-limited and 4 balanced results.
Overall, this is a GPU-leaning combination in this game.
The Titan X Pascal is more often the limiting part in this game, so a GPU upgrade is somewhat more likely to deliver the bigger FPS gain than a CPU upgrade.
This chart shows which upgrade is more likely to unlock more FPS in each tested setting. The lower line represents the part that reaches its limit first. When the CPU and GPU lines stay close together, the system is more balanced. When the gap widens, one component is more clearly holding the other back. Hover any setting to inspect it.
The lower line is the current limiter. The closer the two lines are, the more balanced the CPU and GPU are for this game.
Each line represents an estimated FPS ceiling for one component, rather than live usage alone.
To estimate the CPU ceiling, we pair the Ryzen 7 9800X3D with GeForce RTX 5090, our current GPU anchor. To estimate the GPU ceiling, we pair the Titan X Pascal with Ryzen 9 9950X3D, our current CPU anchor.
The lower line indicates the current limiter, since that component reaches its FPS ceiling first. In most scenarios, that is also the part most likely to deliver the bigger performance uplift if upgraded first.
The percentage shown represents the gap between the two ceilings. In practical terms, it shows how much of the stronger component's potential is left unused because the weaker one becomes the bottleneck first.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 126% above and your GPU is 17% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.
+126%vsrecommended
+17%vsrecommended
+524%vsminimum
+233%vsminimum
Yes, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D paired with the Titan X Pascal can run Euro Truck Simulator 2 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 83 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 17% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 126% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $665.38 ($465.38 CPU + $200 GPU). Since the GPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger GPU will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, upgrading to the GeForce RTX 3070 for around $499 (Rank #137 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance.
For Euro Truck Simulator 2, upgrading the GPU would usually give you the most noticeable improvement. In the Performance Limiter Analysis, the Titan X Pascal is the side that most often caps the frame rate, while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D still has additional headroom in the tested presets. The main bottleneck appears on the GPU side. The largest gap shows up at 4K Ultra, where the GPU reaches about 118 FPS while the CPU still has headroom up to roughly 150 FPS. Across all tested settings, the distribution is 7/12 GPU-limited, 1/12 CPU-limited, and 4/12 balanced.
Euro Truck Simulator 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Euro Truck Simulator 2 requires at minimum a Core i5-6400 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 660 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 25 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-9600 and GeForce GTX 1660 with 12 GB RAM. Your Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Titan X Pascal both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Euro Truck Simulator 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
