Unlike shooters, Naraka focuses on melee combat with fluid animations. The game is visually dense and supports DLSS, which is vital for high frame rates at resolutions above 1080p. An SSD is critical for map loading, and 16GB of RAM is recommended for smooth gameplay.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 246 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 192 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 125 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 279% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1060) for Naraka: Bladepoint. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D is 434% above the recommended CPU (Core i7-7700).
Naraka: Bladepoint supports: DLSS Frame Gen, FSR 3 Frame Gen, AFMF. The GeForce RTX 4090 can use DLSS Frame Gen and FSR 3 Frame Gen, providing up to 2x-3x frame rate boost.
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, 1440p (low/medium), while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1440p (high/ultra), all 4k settings.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $2324. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 246 FPS, equivalent to 0.11 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.178 fps/$ | 0.150 fps/$ | 0.126 fps/$ | 0.106 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.124 fps/$ | 0.112 fps/$ | 0.105 fps/$ | 0.083 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.077 fps/$ | 0.066 fps/$ | 0.062 fps/$ | 0.054 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1080p medium, the Ryzen 9 9950X3D sets the ceiling at about 343 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 406 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 16% (FPS gap: 63 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 6/12 cells, GPU limits 1/12, balanced 5/12.
Your Ryzen 9 9950X3D is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 13% | CPU Limits GPU 16% | CPU Limits GPU 16% | CPU Limits GPU 15% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 6% | CPU Limits GPU 9% | Balanced | Balanced |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | Balanced | Balanced | GPU Limits CPU 6% | Balanced |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU51% - 74% <> GPU75% - 96% <> | CPU51% - 74% <> GPU75% - 96% <> | CPU13% - 39% <> GPU95% - 100% <> | CPU22% - 44% <> GPU87% - 100% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU49% - 70% <> GPU81% - 95% <> | CPU49% - 70% <> GPU81% - 95% <> | CPU10% - 35% <> GPU100% - 100% | CPU19% - 39% <> GPU95% - 100% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU47% - 61% <> GPU73% - 95% <> | CPU47% - 61% <> GPU73% - 95% <> | CPU7% - 25% <> GPU93% - 100% <> | CPU11% - 26% <> GPU85% - 100% <> |
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 7% and 74% and GPU utilization between 73% and 100%. Ryzen 9 9950X3D stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 91% at 1080p to 89% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 46% to 36%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 1440p (2K QHD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 100% usage (100-100%), while the Ryzen 9 9950X3D stays at 22% (10-35%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 46% and GPU 91%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 43% and GPU 94%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 36% and GPU 89%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1440p (2K QHD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 60% (49-70%) and GPU 88% (81-95%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen 9 9950X3D remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 100% average load at 1440p (2K QHD) High while the Ryzen 9 9950X3D still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 434% above and your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+434%vsrecommended
+279%vsrecommended
+1328%vsminimum
+877%vsminimum
Yes, the Ryzen 9 9950X3D paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Naraka: Bladepoint smoothly up to 4k achieving around 125 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 434% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $2324 ($675 CPU (Rank #174 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your Ryzen 9 9950X3D provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X is a great upgrade option for around $4999 (Rank #383 for value).
Your Ryzen 9 9950X3D is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Naraka: Bladepoint performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p high, 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium.
Yes! Naraka: Bladepoint supports DLSS Frame Gen and FSR 3 Frame Gen and AFMF, and your GeForce RTX 4090 is compatible with DLSS Frame Gen and FSR 3 Frame Gen. With Frame Generation enabled, you can expect a 2x-3x FPS multiplier on top of native framerates, significantly boosting perceived smoothness.
Naraka: Bladepoint requires at minimum a Core i5-4460 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 750 Ti (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 20 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-7700 and GeForce GTX 1060 with 16 GB RAM. Your Ryzen 9 9950X3D and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Naraka: Bladepoint FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
