Red Dead Redemption 2FPS onRyzen AI Max PRO 385&GeForce RTX 4090

Red Dead Redemption 2

A masterpiece of the RAGE engine, heavily taxing the GPU with volumetric lighting and water physics. Interestingly, it has relatively low CPU utilization compared to its graphical demands. Be prepared for a massive 150GB install size.

Red Dead Redemption 2 - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low216 FPS
medium186 FPS
high171 FPS
ultra145 FPS
1440P
low153 FPS
medium138 FPS
high133 FPS
ultra115 FPS
4K
low108 FPS
medium104 FPS
high88 FPS
ultra75 FPS

Performance Report

Red Dead Redemption 2

GeForce RTX 4090 + Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 145 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 115 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 75 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 279% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1060) for Red Dead Redemption 2. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is 247% above the recommended CPU (Core i7-4770K).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at all 4k settings.

Performance Limiter Analysis

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p low, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 sets the ceiling at about 219 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 262 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 16% (FPS gap: 43 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 8/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 4/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 16%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 15%
HighCPU Limits GPU 9%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 7%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 13%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 11%
HighCPU Limits GPU 9%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 7%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU50% - 59%
<>
GPU35% - 63%
<>
Medium
CPU46% - 56%
<>
GPU54% - 76%
<>
High
CPU27% - 39%
<>
GPU53% - 75%
<>
Ultra
CPU19% - 37%
<>
GPU54% - 75%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU26% - 43%
<>
GPU56% - 82%
<>
Medium
CPU23% - 41%
<>
GPU82% - 96%
<>
High
CPU23% - 40%
<>
GPU82% - 96%
<>
Ultra
CPU20% - 37%
<>
GPU82% - 96%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU26% - 40%
<>
GPU69% - 86%
<>
Medium
CPU27% - 39%
<>
GPU98% - 100%
<>
High
CPU26% - 38%
<>
GPU98% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU16% - 30%
<>
GPU98% - 100%
<>

Performance Summary

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 16% and 59% and GPU utilization between 35% and 100%. Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 61% at 1080p to 94% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 42% to 30%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) Medium, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 99% usage (98-100%), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 stays at 33% (27-39%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 42% and GPU 61%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 32% and GPU 84%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 30% and GPU 94%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1440p (2K QHD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 32% (23-41%) and GPU 89% (82-96%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 99% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) Medium while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Red Dead Redemption 2 Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
cpu icon
31,508
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-2500K
RecommendedCore i7-4770K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 770
RecommendedGeForce GTX 1060

Your CPU is 247% above and your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.

CPU

+247%vsrecommended

GPU

+279%vsrecommended

CPU

+661%vsminimum

GPU

+539%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 770
Processor: Core i5-2500K
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 150 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 1060
Processor: Core i7-4770K
Memory: 12 GB
Disk Space: 150 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 and GeForce RTX 4090 run Red Dead Redemption 2 well?

Yes, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Red Dead Redemption 2 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 75 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 247% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Red Dead Redemption 2?

Price data is not currently available for this combination. In general, look for setups where the CPU and GPU are balanced — this ensures you're not overspending on one component that the other can't keep up with.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Red Dead Redemption 2 performance?

For Red Dead Redemption 2, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Red Dead Redemption 2?

Red Dead Redemption 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Red Dead Redemption 2?

Red Dead Redemption 2 requires at minimum a Core i5-2500K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 770 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 150 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-4770K and GeForce GTX 1060 with 12 GB RAM. Your Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Red Dead Redemption 2 FPS estimates for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Red Dead Redemption 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.