Garry's ModFPS onRyzen Threadripper 1950&GeForce RTX 4090

Garry's Mod

A Source engine sandbox where performance depends entirely on the mods and contraptions you spawn. RAM errors are common on systems with only 4GB.

Garry's Mod - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low454 FPS
medium385 FPS
high351 FPS
ultra279 FPS
1440P
low287 FPS
medium251 FPS
high231 FPS
ultra200 FPS
4K
low221 FPS
medium200 FPS
high186 FPS
ultra157 FPS

Performance Report

Garry's Mod

GeForce RTX 4090 + Ryzen Threadripper 1950
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 279 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 200 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 157 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 1051% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 750) for Garry's Mod. The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is 67% above the recommended CPU (Core i5).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Ryzen Threadripper 1950:$300(updated 2/10/2026)
Official Launch Price: $999

Combo price: $1949. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 279 FPS, equivalent to 0.14 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.233 fps/$0.198 fps/$0.180 fps/$0.143 fps/$
1440p0.147 fps/$0.129 fps/$0.119 fps/$0.103 fps/$
4k0.113 fps/$0.103 fps/$0.095 fps/$0.081 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Ryzen Threadripper 1950|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1440p high, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 sets the ceiling at about 230 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 403 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 43% (FPS gap: 173 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 16%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 21%
HighCPU Limits GPU 23%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 27%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 37%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 42%
HighCPU Limits GPU 43%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 43%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 38%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 41%
HighCPU Limits GPU 42%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 37%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU27% - 32%
<>
GPU3% - 15%
<>
Medium
CPU27% - 32%
<>
GPU3% - 15%
<>
High
CPU27% - 32%
<>
GPU3% - 15%
<>
Ultra
CPU24% - 32%
<>
GPU3% - 15%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU21% - 26%
<>
GPU3% - 15%
<>
Medium
CPU21% - 26%
<>
GPU3% - 15%
<>
High
CPU21% - 26%
<>
GPU3% - 15%
<>
Ultra
CPU19% - 25%
<>
GPU3% - 15%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU21% - 26%
<>
GPU3% - 15%
<>
Medium
CPU21% - 26%
<>
GPU3% - 15%
<>
High
CPU21% - 26%
<>
GPU3% - 15%
<>
Ultra
CPU19% - 25%
<>
GPU3% - 15%
<>

Performance Summary

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 19% and 32% and GPU utilization between 3% and 15%. Ryzen Threadripper 1950 keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 9% at 1080p to 9% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 30% to 24%.

Load Interpretation

Neither component is close to saturation: CPU tops out at 32% and GPU at 15%. This pattern suggests possible engine-side limits, an FPS cap, or workload constraints unrelated to raw hardware throughput. It also shows why low utilization does not automatically mean there is no FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 30% and GPU 9%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 24% and GPU 9%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 24% and GPU 9%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 30% (27-32%) and GPU 9% (3-15%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen Threadripper 1950 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Garry's Mod Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Ryzen Threadripper 1950
cpu icon
22,077
Your Score
MinimumPentium 4
RecommendedCore i5
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce 6 series
RecommendedGeForce GTX 750

Your CPU is 67% above and your GPU is 1051% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.

CPU

+67%vsrecommended

GPU

+1051%vsrecommended

CPU

+636%vsminimum

GPU

+11449%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce 6 series
Processor: Pentium 4
Memory: 4 GB
Disk Space: 5 GB
System: Windows 7
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 750
Processor: Core i5
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 20 GB
System: Windows 10

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and GeForce RTX 4090 run Garry's Mod well?

Yes, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Garry's Mod smoothly up to 4k achieving around 157 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 1051% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 67% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Garry's Mod?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1949 ($300 CPU (Rank #288 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Garry's Mod performance?

For Garry's Mod, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Garry's Mod?

Garry's Mod does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Garry's Mod?

Garry's Mod requires at minimum a Pentium 4 (CPU) and GeForce 6 series (GPU) with 4 GB RAM and 5 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5 and GeForce GTX 750 with 8 GB RAM. Your Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Garry's Mod FPS estimates for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Garry's Mod FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.