A Valve classic that depends heavily on single-thread clock speed. It runs well on older hardware but benefits from a fast CPU.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 433 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 416 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 353 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 13367% above the recommended GPU (GeForce 8600 GT) for Team Fortress 2. The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1245% above the recommended CPU (Core 2 Duo).
The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X sets the FPS ceiling at 1080p low, 1440p (low/medium/ultra), all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p (medium/high/ultra), 1440p high.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $2189. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 433 FPS, equivalent to 0.2 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.293 fps/$ | 0.260 fps/$ | 0.228 fps/$ | 0.198 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.271 fps/$ | 0.245 fps/$ | 0.224 fps/$ | 0.190 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.237 fps/$ | 0.213 fps/$ | 0.197 fps/$ | 0.161 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 4k low, the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X sets the ceiling at about 502 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 700 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 28% (FPS gap: 198 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 8/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 4/12.
Your Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 8% | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 18% | CPU Limits GPU 13% | Balanced | CPU Limits GPU 10% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 28% | CPU Limits GPU 24% | CPU Limits GPU 16% | CPU Limits GPU 20% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU3% - 6% <> GPU5% - 14% <> | CPU3% - 10% <> GPU3% - 16% <> | CPU4% - 15% <> GPU6% - 20% <> | CPU6% - 10% <> GPU9% - 26% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU3% - 12% <> GPU14% - 23% <> | CPU3% - 14% <> GPU14% - 26% <> | CPU4% - 18% <> GPU13% - 25% <> | CPU6% - 15% <> GPU17% - 32% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU3% - 12% <> GPU17% - 35% <> | CPU2% - 14% <> GPU19% - 39% <> | CPU3% - 17% <> GPU18% - 38% <> | CPU3% - 14% <> GPU22% - 41% <> |
The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 2% and 18% and GPU utilization between 3% and 41%. Ryzen Threadripper 2950X keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 13% at 1080p to 29% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 7% to 9%.
Neither component is close to saturation: CPU tops out at 18% and GPU at 41%. This pattern suggests possible engine-side limits, an FPS cap, or workload constraints unrelated to raw hardware throughput. It also shows why low utilization does not automatically mean there is no FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 7% and GPU 13%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 9% and GPU 20%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 9% and GPU 29%. This shows that GPU demand scales sharply with resolution while CPU load remains comparatively stable.
4K (Ultra HD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 8% (3-14%) and GPU 32% (22-41%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen Threadripper 2950X remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 1245% above and your GPU is 13367% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+1245%vsrecommended
+13367%vsrecommended
+882%vsminimum
+2422%vsminimum
Yes, the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Team Fortress 2 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 353 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 13367% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 1245% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $2189 ($540 CPU (Rank #331 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).
For Team Fortress 2, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Team Fortress 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Team Fortress 2 requires at minimum a Pentium 4 (3.0 GHz) (CPU) and GeForce 6 series (GPU) with 1 GB RAM and 15 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core 2 Duo and GeForce 8600 GT with 2 GB RAM. Your Ryzen Threadripper 2950X and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Team Fortress 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
