A heavy RE Engine title using advanced geometry and global illumination. It has sparked discussion by listing Frame Generation as a requirement for 60 FPS in its recommended specs. An SSD is mandatory.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 128 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 89 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 60 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 93% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2070 Super) for Monster Hunter Wilds. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX is 691% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-11600K).
The GeForce RTX 4090 sets the FPS ceiling at 1080p high, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX still has additional frame-generation headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p (low/medium/ultra), all 1440p settings, all 4k settings.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $9648. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 128 FPS, equivalent to 0.01 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.022 fps/$ | 0.020 fps/$ | 0.015 fps/$ | 0.013 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.014 fps/$ | 0.013 fps/$ | 0.011 fps/$ | 0.009 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.010 fps/$ | 0.009 fps/$ | 0.008 fps/$ | 0.006 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1080p high, the GeForce RTX 4090 sets the ceiling at about 140 FPS, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX has headroom up to 150 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 7% (FPS gap: 10 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 2/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 10/12. Confidence is low because both ceilings are very close in this cell.
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | Balanced | Balanced | GPU Limits CPU 7% | GPU Limits CPU 6% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU63% - 77% <> GPU58% - 87% <> | CPU64% - 80% <> GPU70% - 95% <> | CPU47% - 64% <> GPU93% - 100% <> | CPU47% - 63% <> GPU90% - 98% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU43% - 59% <> GPU63% - 90% <> | CPU44% - 61% <> GPU77% - 99% <> | CPU37% - 60% <> GPU93% - 100% <> | CPU37% - 58% <> GPU90% - 98% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU39% - 52% <> GPU64% - 90% <> | CPU40% - 54% <> GPU79% - 99% <> | CPU33% - 53% <> GPU96% - 100% <> | CPU33% - 52% <> GPU93% - 100% <> |
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 33% and 80% and GPU utilization between 58% and 100%. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 86% at 1080p to 90% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 63% to 45%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 98% usage (96-100%), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX stays at 43% (33-53%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 63% and GPU 86%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 50% and GPU 89%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 45% and GPU 90%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1440p (2K QHD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 52% (44-61%) and GPU 88% (77-99%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 691% above and your GPU is 93% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+691%vsrecommended
+93%vsrecommended
+773%vsminimum
+183%vsminimum
Yes, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Monster Hunter Wilds smoothly up to 4k achieving around 60 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 93% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 691% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $9648 ($7999 CPU (Rank #378 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your GeForce RTX 4090 provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end card with a significantly better value rating.
Your GeForce RTX 4090 is already a top-tier graphics card. While it's technically the limiting factor here (which means you are fully utilizing your GPU's visual horsepower exactly as intended), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Monster Hunter Wilds performance right now. GPU fully utilized at: 1080p high.
Monster Hunter Wilds does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Monster Hunter Wilds requires at minimum a Core i5-10600 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1660 Super (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 140 GB (SSD) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-11600K and GeForce RTX 2070 Super with 16 GB RAM. Your Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Monster Hunter Wilds FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
