PUBG has improved significantly since its early access days but remains a demanding title. Large maps require aggressive asset streaming, making it sensitive to RAM and storage speed. 16GB of RAM is practically mandatory; with only 8GB, you will likely experience stuttering. An SSD is also crucial to ensure textures and buildings load in on time.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 186 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 172 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 98 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 279% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1060) for PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS. The Xeon 6724P is 210% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-6600K).
The Xeon 6724P sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $5271. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 186 FPS, equivalent to 0.04 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.057 fps/$ | 0.044 fps/$ | 0.037 fps/$ | 0.035 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.049 fps/$ | 0.040 fps/$ | 0.034 fps/$ | 0.033 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.031 fps/$ | 0.025 fps/$ | 0.022 fps/$ | 0.019 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 4k medium, the Xeon 6724P sets the ceiling at about 133 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 242 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 45% (FPS gap: 109 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your Xeon 6724P is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 28% | CPU Limits GPU 34% | CPU Limits GPU 27% | CPU Limits GPU 26% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 27% | CPU Limits GPU 33% | CPU Limits GPU 25% | CPU Limits GPU 26% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 36% | CPU Limits GPU 45% | CPU Limits GPU 37% | CPU Limits GPU 37% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU57% - 87% <> GPU70% - 79% <> | CPU28% - 65% <> GPU69% - 82% <> | CPU28% - 65% <> GPU69% - 82% <> | CPU28% - 76% <> GPU69% - 83% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU58% - 91% <> GPU75% - 84% <> | CPU29% - 70% <> GPU97% - 100% <> | CPU29% - 70% <> GPU97% - 100% <> | CPU27% - 68% <> GPU100% - 100% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU58% - 93% <> GPU74% - 84% <> | CPU29% - 72% <> GPU95% - 100% <> | CPU29% - 72% <> GPU95% - 100% <> | CPU28% - 70% <> GPU98% - 100% <> |
The Xeon 6724P + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 27% and 93% and GPU utilization between 69% and 100%. Xeon 6724P stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 76% at 1080p to 94% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 54% to 56%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 1440p (2K QHD) Ultra, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 100% usage (100-100%), while the Xeon 6724P stays at 48% (27-68%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 54% and GPU 76%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 56% and GPU 94%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 56% and GPU 94%. This shows that GPU demand scales sharply with resolution while CPU load remains comparatively stable.
1440p (2K QHD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 74% (58-91%) and GPU 80% (75-84%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Xeon 6724P remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Xeon 6724P and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 210% above and your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+210%vsrecommended
+279%vsrecommended
+718%vsminimum
+521%vsminimum
Yes, the Xeon 6724P paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS smoothly up to 4k achieving around 98 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 210% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $5271 ($3622 CPU (Rank #482 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your Xeon 6724P provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the Xeon Platinum 8571N is a great upgrade option for around $599 (Rank #60 for value) while costing less than your current CPU.
Your Xeon 6724P is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS requires at minimum a Core i5-4430 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 960 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 40 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-6600K and GeForce GTX 1060 with 16 GB RAM. Your Xeon 6724P and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
