A continuous open world with player-built structures creates a heavy streaming load. It scales well but recommends 6GB+ VRAM for higher settings.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 148 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 131 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 99 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 279% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1060) for Once Human. The Xeon E-2374G is 12% above the recommended CPU (Core i7-7700).
The Xeon E-2374G determines the performance ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, 4k (low/high), while the GPU has headroom. The system is well balanced at 4k (medium/ultra).
At 1080p medium, the Xeon E-2374G sets the ceiling at about 190 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 246 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 23% (FPS gap: 56 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 11/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 1/12.
Your Xeon E-2374G is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 15% | CPU Limits GPU 23% | CPU Limits GPU 23% | CPU Limits GPU 13% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 16% | CPU Limits GPU 21% | CPU Limits GPU 23% | CPU Limits GPU 15% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 11% | CPU Limits GPU 6% | CPU Limits GPU 6% | Balanced |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 12% above and your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.
+12%vsrecommended
+279%vsrecommended
+114%vsminimum
+877%vsminimum
Yes, the Xeon E-2374G paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Once Human smoothly up to 4k achieving around 99 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 12% above the recommended requirements.
Price data is not currently available for this combination. In general, look for setups where the CPU and GPU are balanced — this ensures you're not overspending on one component that the other can't keep up with.
For Once Human, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Xeon E-2374G is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k high.
Once Human does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Once Human requires at minimum a Core i5-4460 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 750 Ti (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 55 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-7700 and GeForce GTX 1060 with 16 GB RAM. Your Xeon E-2374G and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Once Human FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
