ARC RaidersFPS onXeon E5-4627 v2&GeForce RTX 4090

ARC Raiders

This extraction shooter bets on visual fidelity with UE5 and DX12, requiring AVX2 support. It uses volumetric lighting and dense effects, with a recommended baseline of RTX 2070 / RX 5700 XT, indicating it is a demanding title.

ARC Raiders - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low230 FPS
medium205 FPS
high165 FPS
ultra128 FPS
1440P
low211 FPS
medium201 FPS
high154 FPS
ultra117 FPS
4K
low152 FPS
medium150 FPS
high113 FPS
ultra85 FPS

Performance Report

ARC Raiders

GeForce RTX 4090 + Xeon E5-4627 v2
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 128 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 117 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 85 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 136% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2070) for ARC Raiders. The Xeon E5-4627 v2 is 23% below minimum CPU requirement.

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Xeon E5-4627 v2 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, 1440p (low/high/ultra), 4k (high/ultra), while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1440p medium, 4k (low/medium).

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Xeon E5-4627 v2:$70(updated 2/11/2026)
Official Launch Price: $2061

Combo price: $1719. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 128 FPS, equivalent to 0.07 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.134 fps/$0.119 fps/$0.096 fps/$0.074 fps/$
1440p0.123 fps/$0.117 fps/$0.090 fps/$0.068 fps/$
4k0.088 fps/$0.087 fps/$0.066 fps/$0.049 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Xeon E5-4627 v2|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p ultra, the Xeon E5-4627 v2 sets the ceiling at about 130 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 193 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 33% (FPS gap: 63 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 10/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 2/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Xeon E5-4627 v2 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 26%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 24%
HighCPU Limits GPU 32%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 33%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 9%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 6%
HighCPU Limits GPU 22%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 30%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowBalanced
MediumBalanced
HighCPU Limits GPU 19%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 29%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Xeon E5-4627 v2 and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU86% - 100%
<>
GPU42% - 61%
<>
Medium
CPU85% - 100%
<>
GPU47% - 65%
<>
High
CPU85% - 100%
<>
GPU47% - 65%
<>
Ultra
CPU87% - 99%
<>
GPU48% - 65%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU36% - 53%
<>
GPU47% - 63%
<>
Medium
CPU35% - 52%
<>
GPU52% - 66%
<>
High
CPU36% - 51%
<>
GPU52% - 66%
<>
Ultra
CPU39% - 54%
<>
GPU53% - 66%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU35% - 51%
<>
GPU49% - 63%
<>
Medium
CPU34% - 51%
<>
GPU54% - 67%
<>
High
CPU34% - 50%
<>
GPU55% - 67%
<>
Ultra
CPU37% - 52%
<>
GPU56% - 67%
<>

Performance Summary

The Xeon E5-4627 v2 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 34% and 100% and GPU utilization between 42% and 67%. Xeon E5-4627 v2 reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 55% at 1080p to 60% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 93% to 43%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a CPU-heavy load profile. At 1080p (Full HD) Low, the Xeon E5-4627 v2 reaches 93% average load (86-100%), while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively lower at 52% (42-61%). This points to heavier CPU-side frame preparation work, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 93% and GPU 55%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 45% and GPU 58%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 43% and GPU 60%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

4K (Ultra HD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 44% (37-52%) and GPU 62% (56-67%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Xeon E5-4627 v2 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Upgrade priority should be the CPU. The Xeon E5-4627 v2 reaches 93% average load at 1080p (Full HD) Low while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively underutilized, so a faster processor would improve frame-time consistency and top-end FPS.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

ARC Raiders Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Xeon E5-4627 v2
cpu icon
9,425
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-6600K
RecommendedCore i5-9600K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 1050 Ti
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2070

Your hardware is below minimum requirements. CPU is the limiting factor (23% below minimum). Expect performance issues. Low settings recommended.

CPU

-47%vsrecommended

GPU

+136%vsrecommended

CPU

-23%vsminimum

GPU

+333%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Processor: Core i5-6600K
Memory: 12 GB
Disk Space: 35 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce RTX 2070
Processor: Core i5-9600K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 35 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Xeon E5-4627 v2 and GeForce RTX 4090 run ARC Raiders well?

Yes, the Xeon E5-4627 v2 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run ARC Raiders smoothly up to 4k achieving around 85 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 136% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 47% below the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run ARC Raiders?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1719 ($70 CPU + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Xeon Platinum 8454H is a great upgrade option for around $6540 (Rank #1 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve ARC Raiders performance?

For ARC Raiders, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Xeon E5-4627 v2 is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for ARC Raiders?

ARC Raiders does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for ARC Raiders?

ARC Raiders requires at minimum a Core i5-6600K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (GPU) with 12 GB RAM and 35 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-9600K and GeForce RTX 2070 with 16 GB RAM. Your hardware falls below the minimum requirements for this game, which may result in poor performance.

6How accurate are these ARC Raiders FPS estimates for the Xeon E5-4627 v2 and GeForce RTX 4090?

These ARC Raiders FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.