This 'Pokémon with guns' survival game runs on Unreal Engine. It is CPU-heavy due to AI simulation for the many creatures. Memory leaks can occur in long sessions, making 16GB of RAM a practical minimum.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 203 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 154 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 97 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 136% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2070) for Palworld. The Xeon Gold 5220 is 9% above the recommended CPU (Core i9-9900K).
The GeForce RTX 4090 determines the performance ceiling at 1440p low, 4k (low/medium), executing at maximum capacity. The system is well balanced at all 1080p settings, 1440p (medium/high/ultra), 4k (high/ultra).
At 4k low, the GeForce RTX 4090 sets the ceiling at about 143 FPS, while the Xeon Gold 5220 has headroom up to 162 FPS. In this scenario, the GPU limits the CPU potential by 12% (FPS gap: 19 FPS). Overall distribution: GPU limits 3/12 cells, CPU limits 0/12, balanced 9/12.
The Xeon Gold 5220 and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | GPU Limits CPU 6% | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | GPU Limits CPU 12% | GPU Limits CPU 8% | Balanced | Balanced |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU49% - 67% <> GPU71% - 87% <> | CPU48% - 64% <> GPU71% - 94% <> | CPU50% - 65% <> GPU76% - 97% <> | CPU46% - 66% <> GPU76% - 97% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU40% - 65% <> GPU79% - 87% <> | CPU39% - 62% <> GPU79% - 94% <> | CPU41% - 61% <> GPU85% - 98% <> | CPU37% - 62% <> GPU85% - 97% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU39% - 63% <> GPU79% - 87% <> | CPU38% - 60% <> GPU79% - 94% <> | CPU40% - 59% <> GPU86% - 98% <> | CPU40% - 60% <> GPU85% - 97% <> |
The Xeon Gold 5220 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 37% and 67% and GPU utilization between 71% and 98%. Xeon Gold 5220 keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 becomes the primary limiter at high visual load. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 83% at 1080p to 88% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 57% to 50%.
This profile is GPU-bound. At 1440p (2K QHD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 92% usage (85-98%), while the Xeon Gold 5220 stays at 51% (41-61%), indicating the graphics pipeline is the limiting stage.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 57% and GPU 83%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 51% and GPU 88%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 50% and GPU 88%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1080p (Full HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 58% (50-65%) and GPU 86% (76-97%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Xeon Gold 5220 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Xeon Gold 5220 and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization & Bottlenecks: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. This is the key to identifying performance bottlenecks in any system.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 9% above and your GPU is 136% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.
+9%vsrecommended
+136%vsrecommended
+217%vsminimum
+657%vsminimum
Yes, the Xeon Gold 5220 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Palworld smoothly up to 4k achieving around 97 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 136% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 9% above the recommended requirements.
Price data is not currently available for this combination. In general, look for setups where the CPU and GPU are balanced — this ensures you're not overspending on one component that the other can't keep up with.
Your GeForce RTX 4090 is already a top-tier graphics card. While it's technically the limiting factor here (which means you are fully utilizing your GPU's visual horsepower exactly as intended), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Palworld performance right now. GPU fully utilized at: 1440p low, 4k low, 4k medium.
Palworld does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Palworld requires at minimum a Core i5-3570K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1050 (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 40 GB (SSD) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i9-9900K and GeForce RTX 2070 with 32 GB RAM. Your Xeon Gold 5220 and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Palworld FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
