StarfieldFPS onXeon W-1350&GeForce RTX 4090

Starfield

Bethesda's Creation Engine 2 is CPU-dependent, especially in cities, and requires an SSD for asset streaming. Optimization tends to favor AMD slightly, but generally requires powerful hardware to run smoothly.

Starfield - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low108 FPS
medium97 FPS
high80 FPS
ultra69 FPS
1440P
low80 FPS
medium73 FPS
high63 FPS
ultra54 FPS
4K
low57 FPS
medium50 FPS
high45 FPS
ultra39 FPS

Performance Report

Starfield

GeForce RTX 4090 + Xeon W-1350
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 69 FPS. At 1440p, frame rates range from 54 to 80 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 39 to 57 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 52% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2080) for Starfield. The Xeon W-1350 is 3% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-10600K).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Xeon W-1350 sets the FPS ceiling at 1080p low, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p (medium/high/ultra).

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Xeon W-1350:$255(updated 2/9/2026)
Official Launch Price: $255

Combo price: $1904. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 69 FPS, equivalent to 0.04 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.057 fps/$0.051 fps/$0.042 fps/$0.036 fps/$
1440p0.042 fps/$0.038 fps/$0.033 fps/$0.028 fps/$
4k0.030 fps/$0.026 fps/$0.024 fps/$0.020 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Xeon W-1350|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 4k low, the Xeon W-1350 sets the ceiling at about 59 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 83 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 29% (FPS gap: 24 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 9/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 3/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Xeon W-1350 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 12%
MediumBalanced
HighBalanced
UltraBalanced
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 26%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 19%
HighCPU Limits GPU 15%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 10%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 29%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 28%
HighCPU Limits GPU 24%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 18%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Xeon W-1350 and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU53% - 90%
<>
GPU50% - 70%
<>
Medium
CPU56% - 88%
<>
GPU82% - 96%
<>
High
CPU56% - 87%
<>
GPU84% - 97%
<>
Ultra
CPU56% - 88%
<>
GPU86% - 99%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU46% - 73%
<>
GPU71% - 79%
<>
Medium
CPU46% - 72%
<>
GPU90% - 98%
<>
High
CPU42% - 71%
<>
GPU93% - 99%
<>
Ultra
CPU40% - 65%
<>
GPU95% - 100%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU36% - 73%
<>
GPU70% - 82%
<>
Medium
CPU36% - 71%
<>
GPU96% - 99%
<>
High
CPU31% - 71%
<>
GPU97% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU30% - 62%
<>
GPU98% - 100%
<>

Performance Summary

The Xeon W-1350 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 30% and 90% and GPU utilization between 50% and 100%. Xeon W-1350 stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 83% at 1080p to 93% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 72% to 51%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) Ultra, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 99% usage (98-100%), while the Xeon W-1350 stays at 46% (30-62%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 72% and GPU 83%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 57% and GPU 91%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 51% and GPU 93%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 72% (56-88%) and GPU 89% (82-96%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Xeon W-1350 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Xeon W-1350 and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Starfield Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Xeon W-1350
cpu icon
18,742
Your Score
MinimumCore i7-6800K
RecommendedCore i5-10600K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2080

Your CPU is 3% above and your GPU is 52% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.

CPU

+3%vsrecommended

GPU

+52%vsrecommended

CPU

+35%vsminimum

GPU

+160%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Processor: Core i7-6800K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 125 GB (SSD Obrigatório)
System: Windows 10
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce RTX 2080
Processor: Core i5-10600K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 125 GB (SSD Obrigatório)
System: Windows 10

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Xeon W-1350 and GeForce RTX 4090 run Starfield well?

Yes, the Xeon W-1350 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Starfield smoothly up to 1080p achieving around 69 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 52% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 3% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Starfield?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1904 ($255 CPU (Rank #98 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Xeon Platinum 8454H is a great upgrade option for around $6540 (Rank #1 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Starfield performance?

For Starfield, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Xeon W-1350 is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Starfield?

Starfield does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Starfield?

Starfield requires at minimum a Core i7-6800K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 125 GB (SSD Obrigatório) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-10600K and GeForce RTX 2080 with 16 GB RAM. Your Xeon W-1350 and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Starfield FPS estimates for the Xeon W-1350 and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Starfield FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.