The Java version is inefficient and single-thread bound, often bottlenecking on the CPU unless you use performance mods. The Bedrock edition is optimized in C++ and runs much better. For Java, the CPU is king.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 178 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 154 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 102 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 1907% above the recommended GPU (GeForce 700 Series) for Minecraft. The Xeon W-3175X is 726% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-4690).
At lower resolutions (all 1440p settings, all 4k settings), the Xeon W-3175X sets the FPS ceiling. As graphical load increases at (1080p high), the GeForce RTX 4090 becomes the FPS-limiting side. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p (low/medium/ultra).
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $4648. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 178 FPS, equivalent to 0.04 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.111 fps/$ | 0.086 fps/$ | 0.058 fps/$ | 0.038 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.095 fps/$ | 0.072 fps/$ | 0.049 fps/$ | 0.033 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.060 fps/$ | 0.046 fps/$ | 0.031 fps/$ | 0.022 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 4k high, the Xeon W-3175X sets the ceiling at about 117 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 217 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 46% (FPS gap: 100 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 8/12 cells, GPU limits 1/12, balanced 3/12.
Your Xeon W-3175X is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | Balanced | Balanced | GPU Limits CPU 11% | Balanced |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 22% | CPU Limits GPU 11% | CPU Limits GPU 6% | CPU Limits GPU 11% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 44% | CPU Limits GPU 45% | CPU Limits GPU 46% | CPU Limits GPU 41% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU23% - 25% <> GPU31% - 83% <> | CPU23% - 25% <> GPU31% - 83% <> | CPU27% - 32% <> GPU34% - 87% <> | CPU28% - 33% <> GPU92% - 100% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU23% - 25% <> GPU31% - 83% <> | CPU23% - 25% <> GPU31% - 83% <> | CPU28% - 31% <> GPU33% - 86% <> | CPU28% - 32% <> GPU91% - 100% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU21% - 25% <> GPU31% - 83% <> | CPU21% - 25% <> GPU31% - 83% <> | CPU27% - 29% <> GPU33% - 86% <> | CPU27% - 29% <> GPU91% - 100% <> |
The Xeon W-3175X + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 21% and 33% and GPU utilization between 31% and 100%. Xeon W-3175X keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 68% at 1080p to 68% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 27% to 26%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 1080p (Full HD) Ultra, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 96% usage (92-100%), while the Xeon W-3175X stays at 30% (28-33%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 27% and GPU 68%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 27% and GPU 68%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 26% and GPU 68%. This shows that workload scaling is limited, which can indicate engine-side constraints.
1080p (Full HD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 30% (28-33%) and GPU 96% (92-100%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Xeon W-3175X remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 96% average load at 1080p (Full HD) Ultra while the Xeon W-3175X still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 726% above and your GPU is 1907% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+726%vsrecommended
+1907%vsrecommended
+1335%vsminimum
+39600%vsminimum
Yes, the Xeon W-3175X paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Minecraft smoothly up to 4k achieving around 102 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 1907% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 726% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $4648 ($2999 CPU (Rank #410 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your Xeon W-3175X provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the EPYC 4585PX is a great upgrade option for around $699 (Rank #66 for value) while costing less than your current CPU.
Your Xeon W-3175X is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Minecraft performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra. GPU fully utilized at: 1080p high.
Minecraft does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Minecraft requires at minimum a Core i3-3210 (CPU) and GeForce 400 Series (GPU) with 2 GB RAM and 1 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-4690 and GeForce 700 Series with 4 GB RAM. Your Xeon W-3175X and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Minecraft FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
