A competitor to Overwatch featuring environmental destruction, which makes it CPU heavy. DX12 and 12GB of RAM are the minimum requirements.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 267 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 213 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 106 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 131% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2060 Super) for Marvel Rivals. The Xeon W-3265 is 38% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-10400).
The Xeon W-3265 sets the FPS ceiling at 4k (high/ultra), while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, 4k (low/medium).
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $5049. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 267 FPS, equivalent to 0.05 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.103 fps/$ | 0.088 fps/$ | 0.062 fps/$ | 0.053 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.070 fps/$ | 0.061 fps/$ | 0.048 fps/$ | 0.042 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.036 fps/$ | 0.031 fps/$ | 0.027 fps/$ | 0.021 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 4k ultra, the Xeon W-3265 sets the ceiling at about 106 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 116 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 9% (FPS gap: 10 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 3/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 9/12.
The Xeon W-3265 and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | Balanced | CPU Limits GPU 6% | CPU Limits GPU 8% | CPU Limits GPU 9% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU39% - 60% <> GPU93% - 100% <> | CPU40% - 60% <> GPU93% - 100% <> | CPU40% - 60% <> GPU93% - 100% <> | CPU44% - 61% <> GPU92% - 99% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU41% - 59% <> GPU95% - 100% <> | CPU41% - 59% <> GPU95% - 100% <> | CPU41% - 59% <> GPU95% - 100% <> | CPU41% - 59% <> GPU95% - 100% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU25% - 44% <> GPU95% - 100% <> | CPU25% - 44% <> GPU95% - 100% <> | CPU25% - 44% <> GPU95% - 100% <> | CPU25% - 44% <> GPU95% - 100% <> |
The Xeon W-3265 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 25% and 61% and GPU utilization between 92% and 100%. Xeon W-3265 keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 96% at 1080p to 98% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 51% to 34%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 1440p (2K QHD) Low, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 98% usage (95-100%), while the Xeon W-3265 stays at 50% (41-59%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 51% and GPU 96%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 50% and GPU 98%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 34% and GPU 98%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1080p (Full HD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 50% (39-60%) and GPU 96% (93-100%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Xeon W-3265 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 98% average load at 1440p (2K QHD) Low while the Xeon W-3265 still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 38% above and your GPU is 131% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.
+38%vsrecommended
+131%vsrecommended
+131%vsminimum
+279%vsminimum
Yes, the Xeon W-3265 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Marvel Rivals smoothly up to 4k achieving around 106 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 131% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 38% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $5049 ($3400 CPU (Rank #513 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Xeon Platinum 8454H is a great upgrade option for around $6540 (Rank #1 for value).
For Marvel Rivals, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Xeon W-3265 is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 4k high, 4k ultra.
Marvel Rivals does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Marvel Rivals requires at minimum a Core i5-6600K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1060 (GPU) with 12 GB RAM and 70 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-10400 and GeForce RTX 2060 Super with 16 GB RAM. Your Xeon W-3265 and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Marvel Rivals FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
