Bethesda's Creation Engine 2 is CPU-dependent, especially in cities, and requires an SSD for asset streaming. Optimization tends to favor AMD slightly, but generally requires powerful hardware to run smoothly.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 76 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 66 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 43 to 47 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 52% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2080) for Starfield. The Xeon W3565 is 76% below minimum CPU requirement.
The Xeon W3565 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, 1440p (low/medium/high), all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1440p ultra.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $1718. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 76 FPS, equivalent to 0.04 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.049 fps/$ | 0.049 fps/$ | 0.049 fps/$ | 0.044 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.049 fps/$ | 0.049 fps/$ | 0.048 fps/$ | 0.038 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.026 fps/$ | 0.027 fps/$ | 0.026 fps/$ | 0.025 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 4k low, the Xeon W3565 sets the ceiling at about 47 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 88 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 47% (FPS gap: 41 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 11/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 1/12.
Your Xeon W3565 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 41% | CPU Limits GPU 32% | CPU Limits GPU 20% | CPU Limits GPU 10% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 36% | CPU Limits GPU 26% | CPU Limits GPU 13% | Balanced |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 47% | CPU Limits GPU 35% | CPU Limits GPU 26% | CPU Limits GPU 14% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU98% - 99% <> GPU27% - 48% <> | CPU96% - 99% <> GPU31% - 52% <> | CPU96% - 99% <> GPU41% - 64% <> | CPU97% - 99% <> GPU50% - 72% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU99% - 100% <> GPU36% - 61% <> | CPU97% - 99% <> GPU40% - 65% <> | CPU96% - 98% <> GPU47% - 68% <> | CPU97% - 100% <> GPU56% - 76% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU96% - 100% <> GPU80% - 87% <> | CPU94% - 100% <> GPU82% - 90% <> | CPU93% - 99% <> GPU83% - 90% <> | CPU93% - 100% <> GPU83% - 98% <> |
The Xeon W3565 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 93% and 100% and GPU utilization between 27% and 98%. Xeon W3565 reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 48% at 1080p to 87% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 98% to 97%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a CPU-heavy load profile. At 1440p (2K QHD) Low, the Xeon W3565 reaches 100% average load (99-100%), while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively lower at 48% (36-61%). This points to heavier CPU-side frame preparation work, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 98% and GPU 48%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 98% and GPU 56%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 97% and GPU 87%. This shows that GPU demand scales sharply with resolution while CPU load remains comparatively stable.
4K (Ultra HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 96% (93-99%) and GPU 86% (83-90%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Xeon W3565 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Xeon W3565 and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your hardware is below minimum requirements. CPU is the limiting factor (76% below minimum). Expect performance issues. Low settings recommended.
-81%vsrecommended
+52%vsrecommended
-76%vsminimum
+160%vsminimum
Yes, the Xeon W3565 paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Starfield smoothly up to 1440p achieving around 66 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 52% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 81% below the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1718 ($69 CPU + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Xeon Platinum 8454H is a great upgrade option for around $6540 (Rank #1 for value).
For Starfield, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Xeon W3565 is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Starfield does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Starfield requires at minimum a Core i7-6800K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 125 GB (SSD Obrigatório) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-10600K and GeForce RTX 2080 with 16 GB RAM. Your hardware falls below the minimum requirements for this game, which may result in poor performance.
These Starfield FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
