This tactical shooter uses the AnvilNext 2.0 engine and features procedural environmental destruction, which can be taxing on the CPU. The Vulkan API helps older hardware maintain performance by better utilizing available resources. Siege is sensitive to RAM speed and latency. The HD Texture Pack can push VRAM usage over 6GB, so cards with 8GB or more are recommended for the best visual experience at 1080p or 1440p.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 403 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 363 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 186 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 611% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 670) for Rainbow Six Siege. The Xeon w5-2565X is 694% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-2500K).
The Xeon w5-2565X sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $3038. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 403 FPS, equivalent to 0.13 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.187 fps/$ | 0.171 fps/$ | 0.153 fps/$ | 0.133 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.159 fps/$ | 0.147 fps/$ | 0.140 fps/$ | 0.119 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.084 fps/$ | 0.078 fps/$ | 0.071 fps/$ | 0.061 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 4k low, the Xeon w5-2565X sets the ceiling at about 252 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 430 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 41% (FPS gap: 178 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your Xeon w5-2565X is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 23% | CPU Limits GPU 17% | CPU Limits GPU 10% | CPU Limits GPU 12% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 25% | CPU Limits GPU 24% | CPU Limits GPU 17% | CPU Limits GPU 20% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 41% | CPU Limits GPU 39% | CPU Limits GPU 40% | CPU Limits GPU 40% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU94% - 100% <> GPU22% - 37% <> | CPU94% - 100% <> GPU22% - 37% <> | CPU38% - 46% <> GPU78% - 80% <> | CPU38% - 46% <> GPU78% - 80% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU83% - 93% <> GPU24% - 43% <> | CPU83% - 93% <> GPU24% - 43% <> | CPU16% - 37% <> GPU79% - 81% <> | CPU16% - 37% <> GPU79% - 81% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU83% - 93% <> GPU24% - 43% <> | CPU83% - 93% <> GPU24% - 43% <> | CPU16% - 37% <> GPU79% - 81% <> | CPU16% - 37% <> GPU79% - 81% <> |
The Xeon w5-2565X + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 16% and 100% and GPU utilization between 22% and 81%. Xeon w5-2565X reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 55% at 1080p to 57% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 70% to 57%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a CPU-heavy load profile. At 1080p (Full HD) Low, the Xeon w5-2565X reaches 97% average load (94-100%), while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively lower at 30% (22-37%). This points to heavier CPU-side frame preparation work, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 70% and GPU 55%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 57% and GPU 57%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 57% and GPU 57%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1440p (2K QHD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 26% (16-37%) and GPU 80% (79-81%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Xeon w5-2565X remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Xeon w5-2565X and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 694% above and your GPU is 611% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+694%vsrecommended
+611%vsrecommended
+2217%vsminimum
+1575%vsminimum
Yes, the Xeon w5-2565X paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Rainbow Six Siege smoothly up to 4k achieving around 186 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 611% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 694% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $3038 ($1389 CPU (Rank #268 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your Xeon w5-2565X provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the EPYC 4585PX is a great upgrade option for around $699 (Rank #66 for value) while costing less than your current CPU.
Your Xeon w5-2565X is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Rainbow Six Siege performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Rainbow Six Siege does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Rainbow Six Siege requires at minimum a Core i3-560 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 460 (GPU) with 6 GB RAM and 61 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-2500K and GeForce GTX 670 with 8 GB RAM. Your Xeon w5-2565X and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Rainbow Six Siege FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
