A heavy RE Engine title using advanced geometry and global illumination. It has sparked discussion by listing Frame Generation as a requirement for 60 FPS in its recommended specs. An SSD is mandatory.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, frame rates range from 55 to 85 FPS depending on quality settings. At 1440p, frame rates range from 43 to 74 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 26 to 41 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 93% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2070 Super) for Monster Hunter Wilds. The Xeon w9-3575X is 323% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-11600K).
The Xeon w9-3575X sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $2324. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 55 FPS, equivalent to 0.02 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.037 fps/$ | 0.032 fps/$ | 0.029 fps/$ | 0.024 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.032 fps/$ | 0.026 fps/$ | 0.022 fps/$ | 0.019 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.018 fps/$ | 0.016 fps/$ | 0.014 fps/$ | 0.011 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1080p low, the Xeon w9-3575X sets the ceiling at about 87 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 218 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 60% (FPS gap: 131 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your Xeon w9-3575X is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 60% | CPU Limits GPU 59% | CPU Limits GPU 54% | CPU Limits GPU 56% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 46% | CPU Limits GPU 52% | CPU Limits GPU 51% | CPU Limits GPU 53% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 60% | CPU Limits GPU 60% | CPU Limits GPU 56% | CPU Limits GPU 56% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU57% - 63% <> GPU58% - 87% <> | CPU58% - 66% <> GPU70% - 95% <> | CPU35% - 48% <> GPU93% - 99% <> | CPU36% - 48% <> GPU90% - 98% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU33% - 45% <> GPU63% - 90% <> | CPU34% - 47% <> GPU77% - 98% <> | CPU22% - 44% <> GPU93% - 100% <> | CPU22% - 43% <> GPU90% - 98% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU27% - 37% <> GPU64% - 90% <> | CPU28% - 39% <> GPU79% - 99% <> | CPU15% - 36% <> GPU96% - 100% <> | CPU15% - 35% <> GPU93% - 100% <> |
The Xeon w9-3575X + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 15% and 66% and GPU utilization between 58% and 100%. Xeon w9-3575X stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 86% at 1080p to 90% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 52% to 29%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 98% usage (96-100%), while the Xeon w9-3575X stays at 26% (15-36%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 52% and GPU 86%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 36% and GPU 89%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 29% and GPU 90%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1440p (2K QHD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 40% (34-47%) and GPU 88% (77-98%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Xeon w9-3575X remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 98% average load at 4K (Ultra HD) High while the Xeon w9-3575X still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 323% above and your GPU is 93% above the recommended specs. Ultra settings at 1080p, or High at 1440p/4K.
+323%vsrecommended
+93%vsrecommended
+367%vsminimum
+183%vsminimum
The Xeon w9-3575X and GeForce RTX 4090 will struggle to run Monster Hunter Wilds at smooth framerates. At 1080p Ultra, you can expect around 55 FPS which is classified as "playable". Consider lowering settings or upgrading your hardware.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $2324 ($675 CPU (Rank #357 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your Xeon w9-3575X provides phenomenal top-tier performance but at a premium enthusiast price. Since you are essentially at the ceiling of current hardware capabilities, there are no meaningful performance upgrades available. However, if you wanted a more cost-effective build that still delivers a great experience, you could theoretically step down to a high-end processor with a significantly better value rating. For example, the EPYC 9455P is a great upgrade option for around $4819 (Rank #344 for value).
Your Xeon w9-3575X is already an incredibly powerful processor. While it's technically the first component to hit its limit (which is completely normal in state-of-the-art builds), there is no meaningful upgrade path that would drastically improve your Monster Hunter Wilds performance right now. CPU fully utilized at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Monster Hunter Wilds does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Monster Hunter Wilds requires at minimum a Core i5-10600 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1660 Super (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 140 GB (SSD) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-11600K and GeForce RTX 2070 Super with 16 GB RAM. Your Xeon w9-3575X and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Monster Hunter Wilds FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
