
A12-9800E

Core i5-12400F
A12-9800E vs Core i5-12400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A12-9800E vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A12-9800E vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A12-9800E
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,416 vs 19,532).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +183.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $252 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1299.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 8.0 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A12-9800E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than A12-9800E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A12-9800E vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A12-9800E
The A12-9800E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,416 points. Launch price was $105.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
The A12-9800E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A12-9800E versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A12-9800E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9800E scores 3,416 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 140.5% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 651 vs 1,700, a 89.2% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A12-9800E vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | A12-9800E | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+24% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | Intel 7 nm-75% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 3,416 | 19,532+472% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 12,380 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 651 | 1,700+161% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 657 |
Memory & Platform
The A12-9800E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A12-9800E versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A12-9800E) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370 (A12-9800E) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).
| Feature | A12-9800E | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 20+150% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (A12-9800E) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The A12-9800E includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9800E targets Low Power, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: A12-9800E rivals Pentium G4600T; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | A12-9800E | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Low Power | Gaming Performance/Value |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A12-9800E was priced at $426, while the Core i5-12400F came in at $174. On launch pricing ($426 vs $174), Core i5-12400F was $252 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A12-9800E delivers 8.0 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F — making the Core i5-12400F the 173.3% better value option.
| Feature | A12-9800E | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $426 | $174-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.0 | 112.3+1304% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















