A12-9800E vs Core i5-12400F

AMD

A12-9800E

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022
Core family
·······

A12-9800E vs Core i5-12400F Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A12-9800E vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A12-9800E vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A12-9800E

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (3,416 vs 19,532).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +183.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $252 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1299.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 8.0 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
  • 150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while A12-9800E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than A12-9800E?
Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 183.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 471.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 183.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 471.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-12400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-12400F comes in $252 cheaper on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $426 MSRP, and it still gives you a 183.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1299.9% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 8.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, A12-9800E can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

A12-9800E vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A12-9800E

The A12-9800E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,416 points. Launch price was $105.

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Processing Power

The A12-9800E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A12-9800E versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A12-9800E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9800E scores 3,416 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 140.5% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 651 vs 1,700, a 89.2% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A12-9800E vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.

FeatureA12-9800ECore i5-12400F
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz+16%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+24%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+60%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
28 nm
Intel 7 nm-75%
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark
3,416
19,532+472%
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
651
1,700+161%
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A12-9800E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A12-9800E versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A12-9800E) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370 (A12-9800E) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).

FeatureA12-9800ECore i5-12400F
Socket
AM4
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+100%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
128 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
8
20+150%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A12-9800E) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The A12-9800E includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9800E targets Low Power, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: A12-9800E rivals Pentium G4600T; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureA12-9800ECore i5-12400F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Low Power
Gaming Performance/Value
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A12-9800E was priced at $426, while the Core i5-12400F came in at $174. On launch pricing ($426 vs $174), Core i5-12400F was $252 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A12-9800E delivers 8.0 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F — making the Core i5-12400F the 173.3% better value option.

FeatureA12-9800ECore i5-12400F
MSRP
$426
$174-59%
Performance per Dollar
8.0
112.3+1304%
Release Date
2017
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.