A12-9800E
VS
Core 2 Duo T5670

A12-9800E vs Core 2 Duo T5670

AMD

A12-9800E

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T5670

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A12-9800E is positioned at rank 1029 and the Core 2 Duo T5670 is on rank 2, so the Core 2 Duo T5670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A12-9800E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
38867%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
36726%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
26666%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8033%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6363%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5567%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3188%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3147%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2865%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2865%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2833%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2756%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2718%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2707%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2682%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
96%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
100%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
100%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
100%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
97%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
97%
#1035
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
95%
#1036
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
95%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
95%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
95%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
94%
#1040
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
94%
#1041
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
94%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
92%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5670

#2
Core 2 Duo T5670
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
43%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
42%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
39%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
38%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
38%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
37%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
35%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
35%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
34%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
32%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A12-9800E (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA12-9800ECore 2 Duo T5670
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom-2M (2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T5670 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA12-9800ECore 2 Duo T5670
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A12-9800E and Core 2 Duo T5670

AMD

A12-9800E

The A12-9800E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,416 points. Launch price was $105.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5670

The Core 2 Duo T5670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 3,440 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The A12-9800E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T5670 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A12-9800E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A12-9800E versus 1.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5670 — a 71.4% clock advantage for the A12-9800E (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A12-9800E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5670 uses Merom-2M (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9800E scores 3,416 against the Core 2 Duo T5670's 3,440 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5670. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A12-9800E vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5670.

FeatureA12-9800ECore 2 Duo T5670
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+111%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+72%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
2048 kB
2 MB
Process
28 nm-57%
65 nm
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Merom-2M (2008)
PassMark
3,416
3,440
Geekbench 6 Single
651
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A12-9800E) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T5670). The A12-9800E includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Core 2 Duo T5670 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9800E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A12-9800E rivals Pentium G4600T.

FeatureA12-9800ECore 2 Duo T5670
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Low Power