A12-9800E vs Core 2 Duo T5670

A12-9800E vs Core 2 Duo T5670 Performance Spectrum

A12-9800E

4 / 4

3,416

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo T5670

2 / 2

3,440

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A12-9800E vs Core 2 Duo T5670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A12-9800E vs Core 2 Duo T5670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A12-9800E

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Core 2 Duo T5670 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 2 Duo T5670.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,416 vs 3,440).
❌Launch MSRP is still $426 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T5670 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Core 2 Duo T5670

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A12-9800E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while A12-9800E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A12-9800E.

Quick Answers

So, is A12-9800E better than Core 2 Duo T5670?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A12-9800E is ahead with a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T5670 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T5670 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A12-9800E is the better buy right now. A12-9800E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $426 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo T5670 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A12-9800E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A12-9800E vs Core 2 Duo T5670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A12-9800E

The A12-9800E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,416 points. Launch price was $105.

Core 2 Duo T5670

The Core 2 Duo T5670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 3,440 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The A12-9800E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T5670 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A12-9800E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A12-9800E versus 1.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5670 — a 71.4% clock advantage for the A12-9800E (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A12-9800E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5670 uses Merom-2M (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9800E scores 3,416 against the Core 2 Duo T5670's 3,440 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5670. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A12-9800E vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T5670.

Feature	A12-9800E	Core 2 Duo T5670
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+111%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+72%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2048 kB	2 MB
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Merom-2M (2008)
PassMark	3,416	3,440
Geekbench 6 Single	651	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A12-9800E) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T5670). The A12-9800E includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Core 2 Duo T5670 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9800E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A12-9800E rivals Pentium G4600T.