
A12-9800E

Xeon E5-4603
A12-9800E vs Xeon E5-4603 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A12-9800E vs Xeon E5-4603 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A12-9800E vs Xeon E5-4603: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A12-9800E
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Xeon E5-4603 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-4603.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4603 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4603, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $202 MSRP).
Xeon E5-4603
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
- ✅Costs $224 less on MSRP ($202 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 109.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.8 vs 8.0 PassMark/$ ($202 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,391 vs 3,416).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A12-9800E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A12-9800E.
Quick Answers
So, is A12-9800E better than Xeon E5-4603?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A12-9800E vs Xeon E5-4603 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A12-9800E
The A12-9800E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,416 points. Launch price was $105.

Xeon E5-4603
The Xeon E5-4603 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,391 points. Launch price was $712.
Processing Power
The A12-9800E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5-4603's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A12-9800E versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4603 — a 62.1% clock advantage for the A12-9800E (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A12-9800E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E5-4603 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9800E scores 3,416 against the Xeon E5-4603's 3,391 — a 0.7% lead for the A12-9800E. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A12-9800E vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4603.
| Feature | A12-9800E | Xeon E5-4603 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+90% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+55% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 10240 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-13% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 3,416 | 3,391 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 651 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A12-9800E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4603 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | A12-9800E | Xeon E5-4603 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (A12-9800E) / not specified (Xeon E5-4603). The A12-9800E includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon E5-4603 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9800E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A12-9800E rivals Pentium G4600T.
| Feature | A12-9800E | Xeon E5-4603 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Low Power | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A12-9800E was priced at $426, while the Xeon E5-4603 came in at $202. On launch pricing ($426 vs $202), Xeon E5-4603 was $224 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A12-9800E delivers 8.0 pts/$ vs 16.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4603 — making the Xeon E5-4603 the 70.7% better value option.
| Feature | A12-9800E | Xeon E5-4603 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $426 | $202-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.0 | 16.8+110% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















