A12-9800E vs Xeon W3565

CPU

GPU

A12-9800E

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017

Buy on Amazon

Xeon W3565

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2009

Buy on Amazon

A12-9800E vs Xeon W3565 Performance Spectrum

A12-9800E

4 / 4

3,416

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon W3565

4 / 8

3,391

0.0%

Pentium Dual Core T2410

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A12-9800E vs Xeon W3565 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A12-9800E vs Xeon W3565: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A12-9800E

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Xeon W3565 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W3565.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3565 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3565, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 36 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 11.5 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).

Xeon W3565

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 36 PCIe lanes vs 8.
✅Costs $132 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.5 vs 8.0 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
✅350% more PCIe lanes (36 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,391 vs 3,416).
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A12-9800E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A12-9800E.

Quick Answers

So, is A12-9800E better than Xeon W3565?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3565 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A12-9800E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A12-9800E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A12-9800E is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W3565 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. A12-9800E comes in 44.9% more expensive on MSRP at $426 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W3565 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W3565 is also 43.8% better value on MSRP (11.5 vs 8.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A12-9800E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A12-9800E vs Xeon W3565 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A12-9800E

The A12-9800E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,416 points. Launch price was $105.

Xeon W3565

The Xeon W3565 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,391 points. Launch price was $70.

⚡

Processing Power

The A12-9800E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon W3565's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A12-9800E versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3565 — a 9.4% clock advantage for the A12-9800E (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The A12-9800E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon W3565 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9800E scores 3,416 against the Xeon W3565's 3,391 — a 0.7% lead for the A12-9800E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 651 vs 513, a 23.7% lead for the A12-9800E that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A12-9800E vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3565.

Feature	A12-9800E	Xeon W3565
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+10%	3.46 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	3,416	3,391
Geekbench 6 Single	651+27%	513
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,726

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A12-9800E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3565 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A12-9800E versus DDR3-1066 on the Xeon W3565 — the A12-9800E supports 125.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A12-9800E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 24 GB — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A12-9800E) vs 3 (Xeon W3565). PCIe lanes: 8 (A12-9800E) vs 36 (Xeon W3565) — the Xeon W3565 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370 (A12-9800E) and X58 (Xeon W3565).

Feature	A12-9800E	Xeon W3565
Socket	AM4	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+125%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+167%	24 GB
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	36+350%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A12-9800E) vs Yes (Xeon W3565). The A12-9800E includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon W3565 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9800E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A12-9800E rivals Pentium G4600T.

Feature	A12-9800E	Xeon W3565
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon R7	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	Yes
Target Use	Low Power	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A12-9800E was priced at $426, while the Xeon W3565 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($426 vs $294), Xeon W3565 was $132 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A12-9800E delivers 8.0 pts/$ vs 11.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W3565 — making the Xeon W3565 the 36% better value option.

Feature	A12-9800E	Xeon W3565
MSRP	$426	$294-31%
Performance per Dollar	8.0	11.5+44%
Release Date	2017	2009

Search A12-9800E on Amazon

Search Xeon W3565 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.