A4-3300M vs Athlon II Neo K345

A4-3300M vs Athlon II Neo K345 Performance Spectrum

A4-3300M

2 / 2

1,186

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II Neo K345

2 / 2

1,191

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-3300M vs Athlon II Neo K345 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-3300M vs Athlon II Neo K345: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-3300M

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6480G, while Athlon II Neo K345 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,186 vs 1,191).
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Athlon II Neo K345

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while A4-3300M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-3300M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II Neo K345 better than A4-3300M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-3300M is ahead with 78.6% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II Neo K345 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II Neo K345 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II Neo K345 is the better buy right now. Athlon II Neo K345 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $50 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that A4-3300M is still the better pure gaming CPU with 78.6% higher max boost clock. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-3300M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-3300M vs Athlon II Neo K345 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3300M

The A4-3300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,186 points. Launch price was $50.

Athlon II Neo K345

The Athlon II Neo K345 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,191 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-3300M and Athlon II Neo K345 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3300M versus 1.4 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K345 — a 56.4% clock advantage for the A4-3300M. The A4-3300M uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II Neo K345 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3300M scores 1,186 against the Athlon II Neo K345's 1,191 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon II Neo K345.

Feature	A4-3300M	Athlon II Neo K345
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+79%	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,186	1,191
Geekbench 6 Single	256	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3300M uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II Neo K345 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A4-3300M versus DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II Neo K345 — the A4-3300M supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-3300M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-3300M) vs 0 (Athlon II Neo K345) — the A4-3300M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A60M,A70M (A4-3300M) and AMD ASB2 (Athlon II Neo K345).

Feature	A4-3300M	Athlon II Neo K345
Socket	FS1	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+25%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-3300M) / not specified (Athlon II Neo K345). The A4-3300M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6480G), while the Athlon II Neo K345 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3300M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-3300M rivals Pentium B940.