A4-3305M vs Core i3-2365M

A4-3305M vs Core i3-2365M Performance Spectrum

A4-3305M

2 / 2

1,812

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-2365M

2 / 4

1,826

+0.8%

Pentium B950

Core i3-2310M

Pentium J3710

Celeron Dual-Core T1500

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-3305M vs Core i3-2365M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-3305M vs Core i3-2365M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-3305M

2011

Why buy it

✅+17.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,812 vs 1,826).

Core i3-2365M

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (235 vs 276).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2365M better than A4-3305M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-3305M is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2365M pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2365M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2365M still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-2365M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2365M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-3305M vs Core i3-2365M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3305M

The A4-3305M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,812 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i3-2365M

The Core i3-2365M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,826 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-3305M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2365M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3305M versus 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-2365M — a 56.4% clock advantage for the A4-3305M (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The A4-3305M uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-2365M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3305M scores 1,812 against the Core i3-2365M's 1,826 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-2365M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 276 vs 235, a 16% lead for the A4-3305M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-3305M vs 3 MB on the Core i3-2365M.

Feature	A4-3305M	Core i3-2365M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+79%	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz+36%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,812	1,826
Geekbench 6 Single	276+17%	235

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3305M uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-2365M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A4-3305M	Core i3-2365M
Socket	FS1	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-3305M) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2365M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6480G (A4-3305M) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2365M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3305M targets Budget Laptop, Core i3-2365M targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-3305M rivals Pentium B950; Core i3-2365M rivals Pentium 987.

Feature	A4-3305M	Core i3-2365M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 6480G	HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	Budget Laptop	Thin & Light Laptop