A4-3400
Celeron G530T
A4-3400 vs Celeron G530T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A4-3400 vs Celeron G530T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A4-3400 vs Celeron G530T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A4-3400
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Celeron G530T
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A4-3400 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,056 vs 1,066).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while A4-3400 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is A4-3400 better than Celeron G530T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A4-3400 vs Celeron G530T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
A4-3400
The A4-3400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,066 points. Launch price was $50.
Celeron G530T
The Celeron G530T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the A4-3400 and Celeron G530T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A4-3400 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron G530T — a 29.8% clock advantage for the A4-3400 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A4-3400 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G530T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3400 scores 1,066 against the Celeron G530T's 1,056 — a 0.9% lead for the A4-3400. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 349 vs 384, a 9.5% lead for the Celeron G530T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-3400 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G530T.
| Feature | A4-3400 | Celeron G530T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz+35% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+35% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,066 | 1,056 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 349 | 384+10% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 655 |
Memory & Platform
The A4-3400 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G530T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-3400 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G530T — the A4-3400 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G530T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A4-3400) and H61,H67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Celeron G530T).
| Feature | A4-3400 | Celeron G530T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM1 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+20% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-3400) vs VT-x (Celeron G530T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6410D (A4-3400) and Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G530T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3400 targets Budget Desktop, Celeron G530T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-3400 rivals Pentium G620; Celeron G530T rivals Pentium G630T.
| Feature | A4-3400 | Celeron G530T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6410D | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A4-3400 and Celeron G530T
