
RTX A400 vs Mobility Radeon X1450

RTX A400
Popular choices:

Mobility Radeon X1450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RTX A400 is positioned at rank 26 and the Mobility Radeon X1450 is on rank 730, so the RTX A400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A400
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1450
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A400 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2010). The RTX A400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon X1450 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 18030.3% higher G3D Mark score and 3100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X1450.
| Insight | RTX A400 | Mobility Radeon X1450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+18030.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-18030.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+3100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX A400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $135 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1243% better value per dollar than the Mobility Radeon X1450.
| Insight | RTX A400 | Mobility Radeon X1450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1243%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($135) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A400 and Mobility Radeon X1450

RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.

Mobility Radeon X1450
The Mobility Radeon X1450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX A400 scores 5,983 versus the Mobility Radeon X1450's 33 — the RTX A400 leads by 18030.3%. The RTX A400 is built on Ampere while the Mobility Radeon X1450 uses TeraScale 2, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (RTX A400) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1450). Raw compute: 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1450).
| Feature | RTX A400 | Mobility Radeon X1450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,983+18030% | 33 |
| Architecture | Ampere | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 800+4% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.706 TFLOPS+142% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A400 | Mobility Radeon X1450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A400 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon X1450 has 128 MB. The RTX A400 offers 3100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | RTX A400 | Mobility Radeon X1450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+3100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A400 draws 50W versus the Mobility Radeon X1450's 50W — a 0% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTX A400) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RTX A400 | Mobility Radeon X1450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 119.7+17000% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A400 launched at $135 MSRP and currently averages $135, while the Mobility Radeon X1450 launched at $100 and now averages $10. The Mobility Radeon X1450 costs 92.6% less ($125 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.3 (RTX A400) vs 3.3 (Mobility Radeon X1450) — the RTX A400 offers 1242.4% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2010).
| Feature | RTX A400 | Mobility Radeon X1450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $135 | $100-26% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $135 | $10-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.3+1242% | 3.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | Broadway |
| Release | April 16 2024 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #397 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















