
A4-3400

Ryzen 7 5800X
A4-3400 vs Ryzen 7 5800X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A4-3400 vs Ryzen 7 5800X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A4-3400 vs Ryzen 7 5800X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A4-3400
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6410D, while Ryzen 7 5800X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 5800X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,066 vs 27,712).
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +785.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while A4-3400 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A4-3400 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-3400.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than A4-3400?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A4-3400 vs Ryzen 7 5800X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3400
The A4-3400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,066 points. Launch price was $50.


Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The A4-3400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5800X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A4-3400 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 54.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The A4-3400 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3400 scores 1,066 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 185.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-3400 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | A4-3400 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 4.7 GHz+74% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+41% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 1,066 | 27,712+2500% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 349 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A4-3400 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-3400 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X — the Ryzen 7 5800X supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5800X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-3400) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A4-3400) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).
| Feature | A4-3400 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM1 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR4-3200+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A4-3400 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6410D), while the Ryzen 7 5800X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3400 targets Budget Desktop, Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-3400 rivals Pentium G620.
| Feature | A4-3400 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6410D | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













