A4-5100 vs Athlon X2 450

A4-5100 vs Athlon X2 450 Performance Spectrum

A4-5100

4 / 4

1,301

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon X2 450

2 / 2

1,295

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-5100 vs Athlon X2 450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-5100 vs Athlon X2 450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-5100

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8330, while Athlon X2 450 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (165 vs 450).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X2 450.

Athlon X2 450

2014

Why buy it

✅+172.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike A4-5100.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,295 vs 1,301).
❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while A4-5100 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-5100 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X2 450 better than A4-5100?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X2 450 is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A4-5100 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-5100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X2 450 is the better buy right now. Athlon X2 450 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $60 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that A4-5100 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (21.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon X2 450 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-5100 vs Athlon X2 450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-5100

The A4-5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.55 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,301 points. Launch price was $50.

Athlon X2 450

The Athlon X2 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,295 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-5100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon X2 450 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4-5100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.55 GHz on the A4-5100 versus 3.9 GHz on the Athlon X2 450 — a 86.2% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 450. The A4-5100 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon X2 450 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5100 scores 1,301 against the Athlon X2 450's 1,295 — a 0.5% lead for the A4-5100. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 165 vs 450, a 92.7% lead for the Athlon X2 450 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A4-5100	Athlon X2 450
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.55 GHz	3.9 GHz+152%
Base Clock	—	3.5 GHz
L2 Cache	2048 kB+100%	1 MB (total)
Process	28 nm	28 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark	1,301	1,295
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	1,500
Geekbench 6 Single	165	450+173%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	800

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5100 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 450 uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the A4-5100 versus DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X2 450 — the Athlon X2 450 supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A4-5100) vs 2 (Athlon X2 450). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-5100) vs 16 (Athlon X2 450) — the Athlon X2 450 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-5100	Athlon X2 450
Socket	FT3	FM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	DDR3-1866+17%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A4-5100 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8330), while the Athlon X2 450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5100 targets Entry Laptop, Athlon X2 450 targets Basic Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-5100 rivals Pentium N3540; Athlon X2 450 rivals Core i3-3220.