A4-5300B
VS
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

A4-5300B vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

AMD

A4-5300B

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-5300B is positioned at rank 781 and the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is on rank 1098, so the A4-5300B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-5300B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15008%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14181%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10297%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3102%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2457%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2149%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1231%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1215%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1106%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1106%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1094%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1064%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1049%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1045%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1036%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
99%
#781
A4-5300B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#782
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
100%
#784
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
99%
#785
Core i5-2380P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $25
99%
#786
Core i5-4690
MSRP: $272|Avg: $120
99%
#787
FX-6120
MSRP: $188|Avg: $54
99%
#788
Core i7-6700TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $175
99%
#789
Athlon II X4 620
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
99%
#791
Core i7-3820
MSRP: $286|Avg: $30
97%
#792
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
97%
#793
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
#794
Core i3-3245
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
97%
#796
FX-4170
MSRP: $157|Avg: $23
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

#1086
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3145%
#1087
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3099%
#1088
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2845%
#1089
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2832%
#1090
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2806%
#1092
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2710%
#1093
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2598%
#1094
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2594%
#1095
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2524%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
100%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
99%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
96%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
94%
#1111
Celeron 867
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1112
Pentium B970
MSRP: $125|Avg: $39
94%
#1113
Core i5-2410M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A4-5300B leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA4-5300BCeleron Dual-Core SU2300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA4-5300BCeleron Dual-Core SU2300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-5300B and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

AMD

A4-5300B

The A4-5300B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,246 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $134.

Processing Power

Both the A4-5300B and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the A4-5300B versus 1.2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 — a 100% clock advantage for the A4-5300B. The A4-5300B uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5300B scores 1,246 against the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300's 1,250 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 428 vs 150, a 96.2% lead for the A4-5300B that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureA4-5300BCeleron Dual-Core SU2300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+200%
1.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,246
1,250
Geekbench 6 Single
428+185%
150
Geekbench 6 Multi
280
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5300B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The A4-5300B supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-5300B) vs 6 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) — the A4-5300B offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X (A4-5300B) and GS45 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300).

FeatureA4-5300BCeleron Dual-Core SU2300
Socket
FM2
BGA956
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+700%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+167%
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-5300B) vs VT-x (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300). The A4-5300B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7480D), while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5300B targets Business Desktop, Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 targets Legacy Mobile. Direct competitor: A4-5300B rivals Pentium G2020; Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 rivals Pentium SU4100.

FeatureA4-5300BCeleron Dual-Core SU2300
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7480D
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Business Desktop
Legacy Mobile