A4-6210 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300

A4-6210 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300 Performance Spectrum

A4-6210

4 / 4

1,499

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2 / 2

1,496

0.0%

Pentium U5600

Core i5-540UM

Pentium Extreme Edition 965

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-6210 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-6210 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-6210

2014

Why buy it

✅+5.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R3, while Core 2 Duo SU7300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌400% higher power demand at 15W vs 3W.

Core 2 Duo SU7300

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 3W instead of 15W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (188 vs 198).
❌Lower PassMark (1,496 vs 1,499).
❌Launch MSRP is still $289 MSRP, while A4-6210 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-6210 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-6210 better than Core 2 Duo SU7300?

Yes. A4-6210 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-6210 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-6210 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-6210 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A4-6210 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Duo SU7300 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 2.6% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-6210 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-6210 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-6210

The A4-6210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1599. Passmark benchmark score: 1,499 points. Launch price was $50.

Core 2 Duo SU7300

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,496 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-6210 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4-6210 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the A4-6210 versus 1.3 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 — a 32.3% clock advantage for the A4-6210. The A4-6210 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-6210 scores 1,499 against the Core 2 Duo SU7300's 1,496 — a 0.2% lead for the A4-6210. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 198 vs 188, a 5.2% lead for the A4-6210 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A4-6210	Core 2 Duo SU7300
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz+38%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	2048 kB	3 MB+50%
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Beema (2014)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,499	1,496
Geekbench 6 Single	198+5%	188
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	338

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-6210 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the A4-6210 versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo SU7300 — the A4-6210 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-6210 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-6210) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo SU7300). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-6210) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo SU7300) — the A4-6210 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-6210	Core 2 Duo SU7300
Socket	FT3	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600+50%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-6210) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo SU7300). The A4-6210 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3), while the Core 2 Duo SU7300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6210 targets Entry Laptop, Core 2 Duo SU7300 targets Ultra-Low Voltage Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-6210 rivals Pentium N3700.