A4-6210 vs Core Duo T2400

A4-6210 vs Core Duo T2400 Performance Spectrum

A4-6210

4 / 4

1,499

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core Duo T2400

2 / 2

1,488

0.0%

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-6210 vs Core Duo T2400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-6210 vs Core Duo T2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-6210

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R3, while Core Duo T2400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌650% higher power demand at 15W vs 2W.

Core Duo T2400

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 15W, a 13W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,488 vs 1,499).
❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while A4-6210 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-6210 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Duo T2400 better than A4-6210?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Duo T2400 is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A4-6210 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-6210 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Duo T2400 is the better buy right now. Core Duo T2400 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $294 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that A4-6210 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-6210 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-6210 vs Core Duo T2400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-6210

The A4-6210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1599. Passmark benchmark score: 1,499 points. Launch price was $50.

Core Duo T2400

The Core Duo T2400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,488 points. Launch price was $16.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-6210 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core Duo T2400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4-6210 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the A4-6210 versus 1.83 GHz on the Core Duo T2400 — a 1.7% clock advantage for the Core Duo T2400. The A4-6210 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core Duo T2400 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A4-6210 scores 1,499 against the Core Duo T2400's 1,488 — a 0.7% lead for the A4-6210.

Feature	A4-6210	Core Duo T2400
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	1.83 GHz+2%
Base Clock	—	1.83 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	2048 kB	2 MB
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Beema (2014)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,499	1,488
Geekbench 6 Single	198	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-6210 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Duo T2400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the A4-6210 versus DDR2-667 on the Core Duo T2400 — the A4-6210 supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-6210 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-6210) vs 2 (Core Duo T2400). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-6210) vs 16 (Core Duo T2400) — the Core Duo T2400 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-6210	Core Duo T2400
Socket	FT3	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600+140%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-6210) vs VT-x (Core Duo T2400). The A4-6210 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3), while the Core Duo T2400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6210 targets Entry Laptop, Core Duo T2400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4-6210 rivals Pentium N3700; Core Duo T2400 rivals Pentium T2310.