A4-6300 vs Celeron G555

A4-6300 vs Celeron G555 Performance Spectrum

A4-6300

2 / 2

1,436

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G555

2 / 2

1,427

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-6300 vs Celeron G555 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-6300 vs Celeron G555: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-6300

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (373 vs 398).

Celeron G555

2012

Why buy it

✅+6.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,427 vs 1,436).
❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while A4-6300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-6300 better than Celeron G555?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G555 is ahead with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A4-6300 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-6300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-6300 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4-6300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $52 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. Celeron G555 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (27.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-6300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-6300 vs Celeron G555 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-6300

The A4-6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,436 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron G555

The Celeron G555 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,427 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-6300 and Celeron G555 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A4-6300 versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G555 — a 36.4% clock advantage for the A4-6300 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The A4-6300 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G555 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-6300 scores 1,436 against the Celeron G555's 1,427 — a 0.6% lead for the A4-6300. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 373 vs 398, a 6.5% lead for the Celeron G555 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-6300 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G555.

Feature	A4-6300	Celeron G555
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+44%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+37%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1024 kB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,436	1,427
Geekbench 6 Single	373	398+7%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	742

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-6300 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G555 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-6300 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G555 — the A4-6300 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A4-6300) and H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Celeron G555).

Feature	A4-6300	Celeron G555
Socket	FM2	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-6300) vs VT-x (Celeron G555). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8370D (A4-6300) and Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G555) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6300 targets Budget Desktop, Celeron G555 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-6300 rivals Pentium G3220; Celeron G555 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	A4-6300	Celeron G555
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 8370D	Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Budget Desktop	Desktop