CPU
GPU
Radeon RX 6300
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V8750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 6300 is positioned at rank 14 and the FirePro 3D V8750 is on rank 370, so the Radeon RX 6300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6300 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The Radeon RX 6300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V8750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 318.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V8750.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6300 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+318.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-318.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (254mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $500 for the FirePro 3D V8750, it costs 92% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 5127% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6300 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5127%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6300 and FirePro 3D V8750
Radeon RX 6300
The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.
FirePro 3D V8750
The FirePro 3D V8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,272 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 6300 scores 5,319 versus the FirePro 3D V8750's 1,272 — the Radeon RX 6300 leads by 318.2%. The Radeon RX 6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the FirePro 3D V8750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8750). Raw compute: 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8750).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,319+318% | 1,272 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.686 TFLOPS+6% | 3.482 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 128+167% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro 3D V8750 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6300 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V8750 has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 6300 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 32-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro 3D V8750) — the Radeon RX 6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 32-bit | 64-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8750). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2+19% | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300) vs UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V8750). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD 2.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6300 draws 35W versus the FirePro 3D V8750's 274W — a 154.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 6300) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V8750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 254mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-87% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 254mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 152.0+3204% | 4.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FirePro 3D V8750 launched at $1799 and now averages $500. The Radeon RX 6300 costs 92% less ($460 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 133.0 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 2.5 (FirePro 3D V8750) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 5220% better value. The Radeon RX 6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-97% | $1799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-92% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 133.0+5220% | 2.5 |
| Codename | Navi 24 | Tahiti |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #379 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6300 and FirePro 3D V8750
