FirePro 3D V8750 vs GeForce GTX 560M

FirePro 3D V8750

2014Core: 850 MHz

GeForce GTX 560M

2011Core: 775 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

FirePro 3D V8750

274

1,272

0.0%

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8670M Dual

1,281

+0.7%

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V8750 is positioned at rank 370 and the GeForce GTX 560M is on rank 165, so the GeForce GTX 560M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8750

#355

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

20807%

#370

FirePro 3D V8750

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500

100%

#371

FirePro 3D V7750

MSRP: $799|Avg: $20

96%

#372

GRID M10-2B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80

93%

#373

Quadro FX 370

MSRP: $129|Avg: $500

92%

#374

GRID M6-0B

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

86%

#375

RTXA5000-6Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

86%

#376

Quadro 6000

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150

86%

#377

GRID M10-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

85%

#378

Tesla K40c

MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500

82%

#379

Tesla M2090

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40

79%

#380

Quadro FX 4800

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80

79%

#381

GRID K180Q

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000

75%

#382

GRID K2

MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80

75%

#383

Quadro CX

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500

66%

#384

GRID P100-8Q

MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550

62%

#385

Quadro FX 550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $10

61%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 560M

#43

Radeon RX 8060S

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

100%

#47

Radeon RX 6700S

MSRP: $479|Avg: $300

98%

#155

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

339%

#157

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

307%

#158

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

306%

#162

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

279%

#163

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

277%

#165

GeForce GTX 560M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#172

GeForce GT 540M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#177

GeForce GTX 860M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

97%

#179

Radeon R9 360

MSRP: $99|Avg: $55

96%

#180

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $65

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V8750.

Insight	FirePro 3D V8750	GeForce GTX 560M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (254mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 560M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro 3D V8750 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 560M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V8750 and GeForce GTX 560M

FirePro 3D V8750

The FirePro 3D V8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,272 points.

GeForce GTX 560M

The GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 775 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V8750 scores 1,272 and the GeForce GTX 560M reaches 1,281 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 560M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 560M). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 0.5952 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560M).

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	GeForce GTX 560M
G3D Mark Score	1,272	1,281
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2048+967%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.482 TFLOPS+485%	0.5952 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+33%	24
TMUs	128+300%	32
L1 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
L2 Cache	768 KB+100%	384 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	GeForce GTX 560M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V8750 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560M has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 560M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 560M) — the FirePro 3D V8750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	GeForce GTX 560M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	3 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	768 KB+100%	384 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 560M). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 3.2 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	GeForce GTX 560M
DirectX	10.1	12 (11_0)+19%
Vulkan	None	1.2
OpenGL	3.2	4.0+25%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 560M). Decoder: UVD 2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 560M).

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	GeForce GTX 560M
Encoder	UVD 2	PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder	UVD 2	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V8750 draws 274W versus the GeForce GTX 560M's 75W — a 114% difference. The GeForce GTX 560M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 560M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 85°C.

Feature	FirePro 3D V8750	GeForce GTX 560M
TDP	274W	75W-73%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	254mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	90°C	85°C-6%
Perf/Watt	4.6	17.1+272%