
FirePro 3D V8750 vs Tesla M2070

FirePro 3D V8750
Popular choices:

Tesla M2070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V8750 is positioned at rank 370 and the Tesla M2070 is on rank 387, so the FirePro 3D V8750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8750
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M2070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 3D V8750 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V8750 | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (254mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla M2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla M2070 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $500), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 925.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V8750 | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+925.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V8750 and Tesla M2070

FirePro 3D V8750
The FirePro 3D V8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,272 points.

Tesla M2070
The Tesla M2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,305 points. Launch price was $3,099.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V8750 scores 1,272 and the Tesla M2070 reaches 1,305 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla M2070 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 448 (Tesla M2070). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 1.03 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,272 | 1,305+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+357% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+238% | 1.03 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 128+129% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 896 KB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V8750 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2070 has 512 MB. The FirePro 3D V8750 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V8750 draws 274W versus the Tesla M2070's 225W — a 19.6% difference. The Tesla M2070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 350W (Tesla M2070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 225W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 254mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.6 | 5.8+26% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V8750 launched at $1799 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Tesla M2070 launched at $3099 and now averages $50. The Tesla M2070 costs 90% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.5 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 26.1 (Tesla M2070) — the Tesla M2070 offers 944% better value. The FirePro 3D V8750 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1799-42% | $3099 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $50-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 26.1+944% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GF100 |
| Release | January 18 2014 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #423 | #698 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












