FirePro 3D V8750 vs Radeon HD 6770
FirePro 3D V8750
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 3D V8750 is positioned at rank 370 and the Radeon HD 6770 is on rank 127, so the Radeon HD 6770 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8750
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6770
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V8750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6770.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (254mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6770 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6770 holds the technical lead. Priced at $129 (vs $500), it costs 74% less, resulting in a 287.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+287.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($129) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V8750 and Radeon HD 6770
FirePro 3D V8750
The FirePro 3D V8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,272 points.
Radeon HD 6770
The Radeon HD 6770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,271 points. Launch price was $129.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V8750 scores 1,272 and the Radeon HD 6770 reaches 1,271 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V8750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6770 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 800 (Radeon HD 6770). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6770).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,272 | 1,271 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+156% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS+156% | 1.36 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+540% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V8750 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6770 has 1 GB. The FirePro 3D V8750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 6770) — the FirePro 3D V8750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6770). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.2 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2 (11_0)+11% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.2 | 4.4+38% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs None (Radeon HD 6770). Decoder: UVD 2 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6770).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 2 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V8750 draws 274W versus the Radeon HD 6770's 108W — a 86.9% difference. The Radeon HD 6770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 254mm vs 198mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 108W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 254mm | 198mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 75-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.6 | 11.8+157% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V8750 launched at $1799 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon HD 6770 launched at $129 and now averages $129. The Radeon HD 6770 costs 74.2% less ($371 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.5 (FirePro 3D V8750) vs 9.9 (Radeon HD 6770) — the Radeon HD 6770 offers 296% better value. The FirePro 3D V8750 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V8750 | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1799 | $129-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $129-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 9.9+296% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Juniper |
| Release | January 18 2014 | January 21 2011 |
| Ranking | #423 | #807 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V8750 and Radeon HD 6770
