A4-6300 vs Celeron N4000C

A4-6300 vs Celeron N4000C Performance Spectrum

A4-6300

2 / 2

1,436

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N4000C

2 / 2

1,430

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-6300 vs Celeron N4000C FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-6300 vs Celeron N4000C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-6300

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8370D, while Celeron N4000C needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron N4000C.

Trade-offs

❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.

Celeron N4000C

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,430 vs 1,436).
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-6300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-6300.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-6300 better than Celeron N4000C?

Yes. A4-6300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-6300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-6300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-6300 still makes the most sense overall. A4-6300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4000C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-6300 vs Celeron N4000C Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-6300

The A4-6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,436 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron N4000C

The Celeron N4000C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-6300 and Celeron N4000C share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A4-6300 versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000C — a 40% clock advantage for the A4-6300 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A4-6300 is built on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the A4-6300 scores 1,436 against the Celeron N4000C's 1,430 — a 0.4% lead for the A4-6300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-6300 vs 4 MB on the Celeron N4000C.

Feature	A4-6300	Celeron N4000C
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+50%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+236%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB
L2 Cache	1024 kB	—
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	—
PassMark	1,436	1,430
Geekbench 6 Single	373	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-6300 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N4000C uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-6300	Celeron N4000C
Socket	FM2	FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-6300) / not specified (Celeron N4000C). The A4-6300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8370D), while the Celeron N4000C requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6300 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-6300 rivals Pentium G3220.