A4-7210 vs Athlon 64 FX-74

A4-7210

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2015

Athlon 64 FX-74

2 Cores2 Thrd125 WWMax: 3 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

A4-7210

4 / 4

1,670

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon 64 FX-74

2 / 2

1,658

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-7210 is positioned at rank 737 and the Athlon 64 FX-74 is on rank 1087, so the A4-7210 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-7210

#725

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1054%

#726

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1039%

#727

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

954%

#728

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

949%

#729

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

941%

#731

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

908%

#732

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

871%

#733

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

870%

#734

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

846%

#737

A4-7210

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#744

Pentium 6805

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

99%

#748

Ryzen 3 7320C

MSRP: $299|Avg: $200

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-74

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

93890%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

88717%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

64416%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

19406%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

15371%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

13447%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

7702%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

7601%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

6921%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

6920%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

6843%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

6658%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

6565%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

6539%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

6480%

#1087

Athlon 64 FX-74

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

100%

#1088

Athlon 64 X2 5600+

MSRP: $505|Avg: $15

99%

#1089

Core 2 Extreme QX9770

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399

99%

#1090

Athlon 64 2000+

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

99%

#1091

Athlon 64 X2 5400+

MSRP: $485|Avg: $78

98%

#1092

Celeron 2.30

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

98%

#1093

Phenom X4 9450e

MSRP: $450|Avg: $430

97%

#1094

Athlon 64 X2 3800+

MSRP: $354|Avg: $20

93%

#1095

Athlon 64 3000+

MSRP: $149|Avg: $10

91%

#1096

Athlon XP 3100+

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

85%

#1097

Athlon 64 3300+

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

79%

#1098

Athlon 64 2800+

MSRP: $178|Avg: $15

71%

#1099

Athlon 64 3700+

MSRP: $272|Avg: $20

69%

#1100

Athlon 64 FX-72

MSRP: $799|Avg: $40

68%

#1101

Athlon 64 X2 4200+

MSRP: $581|Avg: $110

65%

#1102

Athlon 64 3500+

MSRP: $272|Avg: $10

63%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A4-7210 (2015) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3L-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	A4-7210	Athlon 64 FX-74
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Carrizo-L (2015) / 28 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 FX-74 (2006) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	A4-7210	Athlon 64 FX-74
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

A4-7210 Benchmark Check

Athlon 64 FX-74 Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-7210 and Athlon 64 FX-74

A4-7210

The A4-7210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,670 points. Launch price was $50.

Athlon 64 FX-74

The Athlon 64 FX-74 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: F. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,658 points. Launch price was $500.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-7210 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon 64 FX-74 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4-7210 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A4-7210 versus 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-74 — a 30.8% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-74. The A4-7210 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon 64 FX-74 uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A4-7210 scores 1,670 against the Athlon 64 FX-74's 1,658 — a 0.7% lead for the A4-7210. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 208 vs 400, a 63.2% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-74 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A4-7210	Athlon 64 FX-74
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	3 GHz+36%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+100%	1 MB
Process	28 nm-69%	90 nm
Architecture	Carrizo-L (2015)	Windsor (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,670	1,658
Geekbench 6 Single	208	400+92%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	750

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-7210 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 FX-74 uses F (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the A4-7210 versus DDR2 on the Athlon 64 FX-74 — the A4-7210 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A4-7210) vs 2 (Athlon 64 FX-74). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-7210) vs 16 (Athlon 64 FX-74) — the Athlon 64 FX-74 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-7210	Athlon 64 FX-74
Socket	FT3	F
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600+50%	DDR2
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon 64 FX-74 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A4-7210 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3), while the Athlon 64 FX-74 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-7210 targets Entry Laptop, Athlon 64 FX-74 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4-7210 rivals Pentium N3710; Athlon 64 FX-74 rivals Pentium Extreme Edition 965.