A4-7210
VS
Athlon 64 X2 5600+

A4-7210 vs Athlon 64 X2 5600+

AMD

A4-7210

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2015
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 X2 5600+

2 Cores2 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-7210 is positioned at rank 737 and the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ is on rank 1088, so the A4-7210 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-7210

#725
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1054%
#726
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1039%
#727
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
954%
#728
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
949%
#729
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
941%
#731
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
908%
#732
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
871%
#733
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
870%
#734
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
846%
#737
A4-7210
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#744
Pentium 6805
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
99%
#748
Ryzen 3 7320C
MSRP: $299|Avg: $200
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5600+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
94459%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
89255%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
64806%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
19523%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
15465%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
13528%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
7748%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
7647%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
6963%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
6962%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
6885%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
6699%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
6605%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
6578%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6519%
#1087
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
100%
#1088
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
100%
#1089
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#1090
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
99%
#1091
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1092
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
98%
#1093
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
94%
#1094
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
92%
#1095
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
86%
#1096
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
79%
#1097
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
72%
#1098
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
69%
#1099
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
68%
#1100
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
65%
#1101
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
64%
#1102
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
59%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A4-7210 (2015) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3L-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA4-7210Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo-L (2015) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (2006) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA4-7210Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-7210 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+

AMD

A4-7210

The A4-7210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,670 points. Launch price was $50.

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 5600+

The Athlon 64 X2 5600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,665 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The A4-7210 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4-7210 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the A4-7210 versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ — a 27.5% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5600+. The A4-7210 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A4-7210 scores 1,670 against the Athlon 64 X2 5600+'s 1,665 — a 0.3% lead for the A4-7210.

FeatureA4-7210Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz+32%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2048 kB+300%
512K
Process
28 nm-69%
90 nm
Architecture
Carrizo-L (2015)
Windsor (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,670
1,665
Geekbench 6 Single
208
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-7210 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the A4-7210 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ — the A4-7210 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A4-7210) vs 2 (Athlon 64 X2 5600+). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-7210) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5600+) — the A4-7210 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA4-7210Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Socket
FT3
AM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600+50%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-7210) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5600+). The A4-7210 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3), while the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-7210 targets Entry Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-7210 rivals Pentium N3710.

FeatureA4-7210Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R3
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Entry Laptop