A4-7300
VS
Atom 330

A4-7300 vs Atom 330

AMD

A4-7300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Atom 330

2 Cores4 Thrd8 WWMax: 0.1 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-7300 is positioned at rank 672 and the Atom 330 is on rank 39, so the Atom 330 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-7300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12176%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11505%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8354%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2517%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1993%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1744%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
999%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
986%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
898%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
898%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
887%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
864%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
851%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
848%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
840%
#672
A4-7300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#673
Core i5-4430
MSRP: $182|Avg: $60
100%
#674
Celeron G550T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
100%
#675
Pentium G2130
MSRP: $75|Avg: $8
100%
#677
Core i5-4460S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $50
100%
#678
Core i7-6700K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $142
100%
#680
Pentium G3420T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $40
100%
#681
Core i5-3570
MSRP: $194|Avg: $35
99%
#682
Pentium G3450T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $45
99%
#683
Celeron E3200
MSRP: $43|Avg: $5
99%
#684
Core i5-3470
MSRP: $184|Avg: $55
99%
#685
Core i5-3450S
MSRP: $174|Avg: $20
99%
#686
Core i7-5820K
MSRP: $389|Avg: $103
99%
#687
Core i3-4330
MSRP: $138|Avg: $60
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom 330

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
93%
#27
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
192%
#28
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
189%
#29
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
173%
#30
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
173%
#31
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
171%
#33
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
165%
#34
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
158%
#35
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
158%
#36
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
154%
#39
Atom 330
MSRP: $43|Avg: $30
100%
#43
Core 2 Duo SU7300
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
98%
#51
Celeron N2807
MSRP: $107|Avg: $60
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A4-7300 (2014) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA4-7300Atom 330
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Diamondville (2008−2009) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Atom 330 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA4-7300Atom 330
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-7300 and Atom 330

AMD

A4-7300

The A4-7300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,536 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Atom 330

The Atom 330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Diamondville (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA437. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,530 points. Launch price was $43.

Processing Power

The A4-7300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom 330's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A4-7300 versus 0.1 GHz on the Atom 330 — a 190.2% clock advantage for the A4-7300 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A4-7300 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom 330 uses Diamondville (2008−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-7300 scores 1,536 against the Atom 330's 1,530 — a 0.4% lead for the A4-7300.

FeatureA4-7300Atom 330
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+3900%
0.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+137%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB
1 MB
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Diamondville (2008−2009)
PassMark
1,536
1,530
Geekbench 6 Single
349
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-7300 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom 330 uses PBGA437 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-7300 versus DDR2-533 on the Atom 330 — the A4-7300 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-7300 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A4-7300) vs 1 (Atom 330). PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-7300) vs 0 (Atom 330) — the A4-7300 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A4-7300) and Intel BGA437 (Atom 330).

FeatureA4-7300Atom 330
Socket
FM2
PBGA437
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600+50%
DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-7300) / not specified (Atom 330). The A4-7300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8470D), while the Atom 330 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-7300 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-7300 rivals Pentium G3250.

FeatureA4-7300Atom 330
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8470D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Desktop