
Radeon HD 6320

GeForce Go 7300
Radeon HD 6320 vs GeForce Go 7300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 6320 vs GeForce Go 7300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 6320 vs GeForce Go 7300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 6320
2011Why buy it
- ✅200.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌190.6% higher power demand at 186W vs 64W.
GeForce Go 7300
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 64W instead of 186W, a 122W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6320 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6320 vs GeForce Go 7300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6320
The Radeon HD 6320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $180.

GeForce Go 7300
The GeForce Go 7300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 6320 scores 147 versus the GeForce Go 7300's 52 — the Radeon HD 6320 leads by 182.7%. The Radeon HD 6320 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce Go 7300 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320) vs 384 (GeForce Go 7300). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7300).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 147+183% | 52 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+233% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.92 TFLOPS+152% | 0.7626 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+900% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce Go 7300 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6320 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6320 and 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7300. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6320) vs 256 KB (GeForce Go 7300) — the Radeon HD 6320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 6320) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7300). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+24% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.5+114% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6320) vs No (GeForce Go 7300). Decoder: UVD 3 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6320) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7300).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6320 draws 186W versus the GeForce Go 7300's 64W — a 97.6% difference. The GeForce Go 7300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6320) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7300). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 186W | 64W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce Go 7300 (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6320 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30 | — |
| Codename | Cayman | GK107 |
| Release | December 1 2011 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #598 | #777 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














