GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce Go 7300

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

2011Core: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7300

2014Core: 993 MHz
Similar parts
······

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce Go 7300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce Go 7300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce Go 7300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

2011

Why buy it

  • +13.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 81.3% higher power demand at 116W vs 64W.

GeForce Go 7300

2014

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 64W instead of 116W, a 52W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (52 vs 59).
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 13.5% in PassMark G3D (59 vs 52), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce Go 7300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7300

The GeForce Go 7300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $89.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra scores 59 versus the GeForce Go 7300's 52 — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra leads by 13.5%. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GeForce Go 7300 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 384 (GeForce Go 7300). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7300).

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce Go 7300
G3D Mark Score
59+13%
52
Architecture
Rankine
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
0.7626 TFLOPS+10%
ROPs
24+50%
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
256 KB+700%
32 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce Go 7300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7300 carries 512 MB. GeForce Go 7300 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7300. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 256 KB (GeForce Go 7300) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce Go 7300
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7300). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce Go 7300
DirectX
9.0a
9.0c
OpenGL
1.5
2.1+40%
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra draws 116W versus the GeForce Go 7300's 64W — a 57.8% difference. The GeForce Go 7300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7300). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce Go 7300
TDP
116W
64W-45%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
229mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
0.5
0.8+60%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce Go 7300 (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce Go 7300
MSRP
$0
Codename
GF116
GK107
Release
March 15 2011
May 29 2014
Ranking
#761
#777

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.