
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce Go 7300

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
Popular choices:

GeForce Go 7300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 13.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce Go 7300 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+13.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-13.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and GeForce Go 7300

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce Go 7300
The GeForce Go 7300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra scores 59 versus the GeForce Go 7300's 52 — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra leads by 13.5%. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GeForce Go 7300 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 384 (GeForce Go 7300). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7300).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 59+13% | 52 |
| Architecture | Rankine | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 0.7626 TFLOPS+10% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+700% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7300 has 512 MB. The GeForce Go 7300 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 256 KB (GeForce Go 7300) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7300). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 2.1+40% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra draws 116W versus the GeForce Go 7300's 64W — a 57.8% difference. The GeForce Go 7300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7300). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 116W | 64W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 0.8+60% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 7300 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | — |
| Codename | GF116 | GK107 |
| Release | March 15 2011 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #761 | #777 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















