GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs RADEON X800 PRO

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs RADEON X800 PRO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs RADEON X800 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 116W instead of 250W, a 134W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (59 vs 65).
❌2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

RADEON X800 PRO

2020

Why buy it

✅+10.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X800 PRO is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌115.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 116W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON X800 PRO is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 10.2% in PassMark G3D (65 vs 59), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X800 PRO is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, 60 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2011. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON X800 PRO makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs RADEON X800 PRO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.

RADEON X800 PRO

The RADEON X800 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points. Launch price was $579.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra scores 59 versus the RADEON X800 PRO's 65 — the RADEON X800 PRO leads by 10.2%. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is built on Rankine while the RADEON X800 PRO uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 3,840 (RADEON X800 PRO). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 PRO).

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	RADEON X800 PRO
G3D Mark Score	59	65+10%
Architecture	Rankine	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	192	3840+1900%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	16.17 TFLOPS+2239%
ROPs	24	96+300%
TMUs	32	240+650%
L1 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	4 MB+953%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X800 PRO leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	RADEON X800 PRO
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and 64-bit on the RADEON X800 PRO. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 PRO) — the RADEON X800 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	RADEON X800 PRO
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	4 MB+953%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra draws 116W versus the RADEON X800 PRO's 250W — a 73.2% difference. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 350W (RADEON X800 PRO). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	RADEON X800 PRO
TDP	116W-54%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	229mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.5+67%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra came in at $0, while the RADEON X800 PRO launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5950 Ultra was 100+% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 0.2 (RADEON X800 PRO) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X800 PRO (2020 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	RADEON X800 PRO
MSRP	$0-100%	$399
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.2
Codename	GF116	Navi 21
Release	March 15 2011	October 28 2020
Ranking	#761	#65

Search GeForce FX 5950 Ultra on Amazon

Search RADEON X800 PRO on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.