GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs MOBILITY RADEON X700

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

2011Core: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

MOBILITY RADEON X700

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs MOBILITY RADEON X700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

2011

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
  • More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (59 vs 67).
  • 2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 132% higher power demand at 116W vs 50W.

MOBILITY RADEON X700

2010

Why buy it

  • +13.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 116W, a 66W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
MOBILITY RADEON X700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 13.6% in PassMark G3D (67 vs 59), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 256 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM and a newer 2011 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
MOBILITY RADEON X700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON X700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON X700

The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra scores 59 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700's 67 — the MOBILITY RADEON X700 leads by 13.6%. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is built on Rankine while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X700).

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraMOBILITY RADEON X700
G3D Mark Score
59
67+14%
Architecture
Rankine
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
192
800+317%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+62%
ROPs
24+50%
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
256 KB+220%
80 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraMOBILITY RADEON X700
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has 256 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 carries 128 MB. GeForce FX 5950 Ultra gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X700. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON X700) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraMOBILITY RADEON X700
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB+100%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraMOBILITY RADEON X700
DirectX
9.0a
9.0b
OpenGL
1.5
2.1+40%
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra draws 116W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700's 50W — a 79.5% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraMOBILITY RADEON X700
TDP
116W
50W-57%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
0.5
1.3+160%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra came in at $0, while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5950 Ultra was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 0.7 (MOBILITY RADEON X700) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5950 Ultra (2011 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraMOBILITY RADEON X700
MSRP
$0-100%
$100
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.7
Codename
GF116
Broadway
Release
March 15 2011
January 7 2010
Ranking
#761
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.