GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce Go 7400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce Go 7400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce Go 7400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (59 vs 66).
❌2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌81.3% higher power demand at 116W vs 64W.

GeForce Go 7400

2014

Why buy it

✅+11.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Draws 64W instead of 116W, a 52W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce Go 7400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 11.9% in PassMark G3D (66 vs 59), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce Go 7400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce Go 7400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce Go 7400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce Go 7400

The GeForce Go 7400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra scores 59 versus the GeForce Go 7400's 66 — the GeForce Go 7400 leads by 11.9%. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GeForce Go 7400 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 384 (GeForce Go 7400). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7400).

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce Go 7400
G3D Mark Score	59	66+12%
Architecture	Rankine	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	0.7626 TFLOPS+10%
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	256 KB+700%	32 KB
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce Go 7400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7400. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 256 KB (GeForce Go 7400) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce Go 7400
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7400). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce Go 7400
DirectX	9.0a	9.0c
OpenGL	1.5	2.1+40%
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra draws 116W versus the GeForce Go 7400's 64W — a 57.8% difference. The GeForce Go 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7400). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce Go 7400
TDP	116W	64W-45%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	0.5	1.0+100%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce Go 7400 (2014 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce Go 7400
MSRP	$0	—
Codename	GF116	GK107
Release	March 15 2011	May 29 2014
Ranking	#761	#777

Search GeForce FX 5950 Ultra on Amazon

Search GeForce Go 7400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.