GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce G 103M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce G 103M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce G 103M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌286.7% higher power demand at 116W vs 30W.

GeForce G 103M

2017

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 116W, a 86W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce G 103M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 6.8% in PassMark G3D (63 vs 59), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce G 103M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce G 103M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce G 103M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce G 103M

The GeForce G 103M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra scores 59 versus the GeForce G 103M's 63 — the GeForce G 103M leads by 6.8%. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GeForce G 103M uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 384 (GeForce G 103M). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G 103M).

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce G 103M
G3D Mark Score	59	63+7%
Architecture	Rankine	Pascal
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	192	384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	1.127 TFLOPS+63%
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	256 KB+78%	144 KB
L2 Cache	384 KB	512 KB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce G 103M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce G 103M carries 512 MB. GeForce G 103M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and 128-bit on the GeForce G 103M. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 512 KB (GeForce G 103M) — the GeForce G 103M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce G 103M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	384 KB	512 KB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 10.0 (GeForce G 103M). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce G 103M
DirectX	9.0a	10.0+11%
OpenGL	1.5	3.3+120%
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra draws 116W versus the GeForce G 103M's 30W — a 117.8% difference. The GeForce G 103M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 350W (GeForce G 103M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce G 103M
TDP	116W	30W-74%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	0.5	2.1+320%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce G 103M (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce G 103M
MSRP	$0	—
Codename	GF116	GP108
Release	March 15 2011	May 17 2017
Ranking	#761	#641

Search GeForce FX 5950 Ultra on Amazon

Search GeForce G 103M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.