GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon 2100

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

2011Core: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 2100

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon 2100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon 2100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

2011

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 132% higher power demand at 116W vs 50W.

Radeon 2100

2019

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 2100 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 116W, a 66W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 2100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (60 vs 59), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 2100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 2100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon 2100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon 2100

The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra scores 59 and the Radeon 2100 reaches 60 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is built on Rankine while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100).

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraRadeon 2100
G3D Mark Score
59
60+2%
Architecture
Rankine
GCN 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
0.7864 TFLOPS+14%
ROPs
24+200%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
256 KB+167%
96 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB+200%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 2100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraRadeon 2100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 2100 carries 512 MB. Radeon 2100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and 64-bit on the Radeon 2100. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 128 KB (Radeon 2100) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraRadeon 2100
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB+200%
128 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 9.0b (Radeon 2100). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraRadeon 2100
DirectX
9.0a
9.0b
OpenGL
1.5
2.0+33%
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra draws 116W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 79.5% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraRadeon 2100
TDP
116W
50W-57%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
0.5
1.2+140%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra came in at $0, while the Radeon 2100 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5950 Ultra was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 0.4 (Radeon 2100) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 2100 (2019 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce FX 5950 UltraRadeon 2100
MSRP
$0-100%
$149
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.4
Codename
GF116
Polaris 24
Release
March 15 2011
May 13 2019
Ranking
#761
#898

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.