
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

Radeon 2100
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon 2100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon 2100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌132% higher power demand at 116W vs 50W.
Radeon 2100
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 2100 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 116W, a 66W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs Radeon 2100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra scores 59 and the Radeon 2100 reaches 60 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is built on Rankine while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 59 | 60+2% |
| Architecture | Rankine | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+14% |
| ROPs | 24+200% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+167% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+200% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 2100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 2100 carries 512 MB. Radeon 2100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and 64-bit on the Radeon 2100. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 128 KB (Radeon 2100) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+200% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 9.0b (Radeon 2100). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 2.0+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra draws 116W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 79.5% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 116W | 50W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 1.2+140% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra came in at $0, while the Radeon 2100 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5950 Ultra was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 0.4 (Radeon 2100) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 2100 (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.4 |
| Codename | GF116 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | March 15 2011 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #761 | #898 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














