GeForce 8200M G vs GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

NVIDIA

GeForce 8200M G

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

2011Core: 900 MHz
Similar parts
······

GeForce 8200M G vs GeForce FX 5950 Ultra Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8200M G vs GeForce FX 5950 Ultra FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8200M G vs GeForce FX 5950 Ultra: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8200M G

2014

Why buy it

  • +10.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Draws 33W instead of 116W, a 83W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

2011

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (59 vs 65).
  • 2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 251.5% higher power demand at 116W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 8200M G is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 10.2% in PassMark G3D (65 vs 59), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 8200M G is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8200M G makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 8200M G vs GeForce FX 5950 Ultra Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8200M G

The GeForce 8200M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8200M G scores 65 versus the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra's 59 — the GeForce 8200M G leads by 10.2%. The GeForce 8200M G is built on Maxwell while the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8200M G) vs 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8200M G) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra).

FeatureGeForce 8200M GGeForce FX 5950 Ultra
G3D Mark Score
65+10%
59
Architecture
Maxwell
Rankine
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384+100%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS+25%
0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
24+200%
TMUs
16
32+100%
L1 Cache
192 KB
256 KB+33%
L2 Cache
1 MB+163%
0.38 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 8200M GGeForce FX 5950 Ultra
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8200M G and 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8200M G) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) — the GeForce 8200M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 8200M GGeForce FX 5950 Ultra
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+163%
0.38 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FL10_0) (GeForce 8200M G) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 8200M GGeForce FX 5950 Ultra
DirectX
11.1 (FL10_0)+23%
9.0a
OpenGL
3.3+120%
1.5
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8200M G draws 33W versus the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra's 116W — a 111.4% difference. The GeForce 8200M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8200M G) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce 8200M GGeForce FX 5950 Ultra
TDP
33W-72%
116W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
229mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
2.0+300%
0.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8200M G came in at $0, while the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 8200M G) vs Infinity (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8200M G (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 8200M GGeForce FX 5950 Ultra
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
GM108
GF116
Release
March 12 2014
March 15 2011
Ranking
#854
#761

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.