GeForce 8200M G
RADEON X600 PRO
GeForce 8200M G vs RADEON X600 PRO Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8200M G vs RADEON X600 PRO FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8200M G vs RADEON X600 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8200M G
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RADEON X600 PRO across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
RADEON X600 PRO
2020Why buy it
- ✅100.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅GeForce 8200M G is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X600 PRO is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8200M G vs RADEON X600 PRO Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 8200M G
The GeForce 8200M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points.
RADEON X600 PRO
The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8200M G scores 65 and the RADEON X600 PRO reaches 67 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8200M G is built on Maxwell while the RADEON X600 PRO uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8200M G) vs 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8200M G) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8200M G | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 65 | 67+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 6.39 TFLOPS+640% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1560 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 16 | 128+700% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8200M G gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X600 PRO leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8200M G | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8200M G has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X600 PRO carries 512 MB. RADEON X600 PRO gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8200M G and 64-bit on the RADEON X600 PRO. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8200M G) vs 3 MB (RADEON X600 PRO) — the RADEON X600 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8200M G | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8200M G | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP3) vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 8200M G) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 (RADEON X600 PRO).
| Feature | GeForce 8200M G | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP3) | MPEG-2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8200M G draws 33W versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 8200M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8200M G) vs 350W (RADEON X600 PRO). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce 8200M G | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-78% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 65mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0+400% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8200M G came in at $0, while the RADEON X600 PRO launched at $99. On MSRP, GeForce 8200M G was 100+% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 8200M G) vs 0.7 (RADEON X600 PRO) — the GeForce 8200M G offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X600 PRO (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 8200M G | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $99 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.7 |
| Codename | GM108 | Navi 10 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #854 | #216 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8200M G and RADEON X600 PRO
