
GeForce 8200M G vs GeForce Go 6600

GeForce 8200M G
Popular choices:

GeForce Go 6600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 6600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 8200M G offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 8200M G | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 6600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8200M G and GeForce Go 6600

GeForce 8200M G
The GeForce 8200M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points.

GeForce Go 6600
The GeForce Go 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8200M G scores 65 versus the GeForce Go 6600's 69 — the GeForce Go 6600 leads by 6.2%. The GeForce 8200M G is built on Maxwell while the GeForce Go 6600 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8200M G) vs 960 (GeForce Go 6600). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8200M G) vs 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6600). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8200M G | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 65 | 69+6% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 960+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 1.981 TFLOPS+129% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz+9% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 24+200% |
| TMUs | 16 | 80+400% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+140% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+163% | 0.38 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8200M G | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8200M G comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 6600 has 128 MB. The GeForce 8200M G offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8200M G) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce Go 6600) — the GeForce 8200M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8200M G | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+163% | 0.38 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (FL10_0) (GeForce 8200M G) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 6600). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8200M G | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (FL10_0)+23% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP3) vs VP1. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 8200M G) vs MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce Go 6600).
| Feature | GeForce 8200M G | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP3) | VP1 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | MPEG-2,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8200M G draws 33W versus the GeForce Go 6600's 140W — a 123.7% difference. The GeForce 8200M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8200M G) vs 350W (GeForce Go 6600). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce 8200M G | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-76% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0+300% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8200M G is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 8200M G | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | — |
| Codename | GM108 | GK106 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | September 6 2012 |
| Ranking | #854 | #490 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















